IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-crocker-inreply-react-07

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Wed, 10 February 2021 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703BD3A0FEC; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:30:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bbiw.net header.b=z5sQGEcR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=SHu3NyZO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYg68FGBAmu1; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2464B3A0FEA; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E2ED60; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:30:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:30:34 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbiw.net; h= subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=z S8zQVthYM/9rldGJw55Khtl+AnUO8YcWsCQTQ5pkW4=; b=z5sQGEcRYvyY76a1n dCokeNNmWi9xqiUphWIMnnlw0cVgBacayPI+Wyxif/oO3sIXZgZ89q0ePW+zaG64 jRYXC0sUuBsUvjoR8DmRuc3A3QdGbuqxYrR2Nc2selVxAm8ZLGUCcYU+DLbqCc7w vsEAH0es6tvXm1M7We+M68ZGXKyuBlsauGUgnWsqp8cJnRL4EOwEfQFYBmBgmgZF cJoHalCMHGFDeOg6XY+2rPNTHVprzPbza4OSZhNiC/TOzimERibXoY6+iiXf3H4R a3PJ92K+XqWC3YgQdgwKnJKdBA7yRzHtZOANsd90kA9GJIgtePqBJV66/dd50/6Y Pldug==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zS8zQVthYM/9rldGJw55Khtl+AnUO8YcWsCQTQ5pk W4=; b=SHu3NyZOoRdRMBrnmWd+mnTgagkcALZl9vINgn5xvx1btP13m41eHkuOg bmwnXjKQZ6wFuMLO7tE7Pehs4yw0MYEvNw1YVxhBBoBmJsYOsLezBSf4xT+bzgy/ zNys4WOGSF3AOvwpINIxBcfzzEQpifEfSwJinzHxvVma79/qPXxapoA2OmMg3vD6 kItXCi43iWJpp22bWeXxZ5L9zLuxYaAod3GvSeDytTQVRZpfuDQjfEukdAtmf8+y rfdvgXQKwAxqeNvNef0J/+pmmDZFDwVwCbAQvCYtsHvNSLhN+QfDYlggc8XDlu82 vA1fb44xkq92eMXFImjMnG8UXeqJA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:-d8jYMU32favjKfhzV7HrRGIly_f-yIWwODCO_W6BGqIt65sB7_oNA> <xme:-d8jYDKd57RKNwGGATVZZuDP5FVr9uUteKPja8yfrZ3TKY0Se6_-kNGRks7IPxAEr Y_kQvN7mLC8zYm_XA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheejgdehvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefuvfhfhfhokffffgggjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgv ucevrhhotghkvghruceouggtrhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepiefhvdeugfejkefftdfhleevleetveefgeetfeegteejjedujeeugeehfeeh gfeinecuffhomhgrihhnpegssghifidrnhgvthenucfkphepuddtkedrvddviedrudeivd drieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep uggtrhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:-d8jYECvDuuasIJ7KuUOJ4O75Ml7makw4mUSXXsfm9MlaGiC3RfJBQ> <xmx:-d8jYLfTQGMTBsgya-NMBRiheEZ9dhzWH9i4EKrscKLxvsNgkU_D5g> <xmx:-d8jYL2-BOEZ62EaWAZobeFLIsrOZ0Osn0leXSCMz2aCrjD38GlOFA> <xmx:-d8jYJR0qSAXQjl8V6g7DAWRaAjJ9K2c3q2rRAuZO65D4EL__Qf0SQ>
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E65FC24005D; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:30:32 -0500 (EST)
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-crocker-inreply-react.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
References: <878s7xrjp1.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <5053cdc8-494b-7343-2a60-9c67cf563624@bbiw.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:30:30 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <878s7xrjp1.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/sicwSSWwaB_1-qfLkyacjId764E>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-crocker-inreply-react-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:30:37 -0000

On 2/8/2021 7:42 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> After sending my previous message, I realized that I had gone to length
> explaining why I considered the term "accompanying" to be ill-defined,
> but I had forgotten to mention that in my review, I'd added "Or perhaps
> this should be forward-referenced to the discussion in section 3."  Just
> adding a reference to section 3 would clarify it, because section 3
> covers the matter well.
> 
> Another version that would be good is "The emoji(s) express a
> recipient's summary reaction to the specific message referenced by the
> In-Reply-To header field of the message in which it is present."


Here's the latest version:

The emoji(s) express a recipient's summary reaction to the specific 
message referenced by the accompanying In-Reply-To header field, for the 
message in which they both are present. [Mail-Fmt]. For processing 
details, see Section 3.



d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email