Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 20 May 2015 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4421A90C2; Wed, 20 May 2015 13:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fsrwGAkpV8Z; Wed, 20 May 2015 13:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA811A90C3; Wed, 20 May 2015 13:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t4KKdHS2051630 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 May 2015 15:39:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <555CF0F0.5000502@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:39:12 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <5554F5D3.7080204@nostrum.com> <5559B2FA.20801@ericsson.com> <8469C57F-5864-4B9E-9A3B-428DDB4101FD@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8469C57F-5864-4B9E-9A3B-428DDB4101FD@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/tlHI8Kd9anJz28r4abj8k_p03FA>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, avtext@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 20:39:23 -0000
On 5/20/15 3:25 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Magnus and Robert: Is there an action implied here? I see that Magnus > agreed that there was an oversight in regards to security, but it's > not clear to me what action (if any) is planned. I think Magnus was sketching out proposed new text for the document. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > On 18 May 2015, at 4:38, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > >> Robert Sparks skrev den 2015-05-14 21:21: >> >>> Major issues: >>> >>> I'm surprised that there is no mention of how SRTP fits into the >>> vocabulary this >>> document builds. Would it be a mistake for someone to think of SRTP >>> as what >>> this document calls a transformation? Are there any consequences of >>> using SRTP >>> on one or more of the streams being associated that impact how you >>> would >>> talk about >>> the association? (There are certainly consequences about which elements >>> can see >>> into the various streams). >>> >> >> Yes, encryption is clearly a transformation. And there are cases >> where the order of the encryption and other transformations, like >> FEC, do matter. Thus, I agree that it is an significant oversight to >> not include security. >> >> So SRTP is an Securing / Protection (as it is not only Encryption) >> transformation that operates on Source RTP Streams or Redundancy RTP >> Streams to create Secured Source RTP Streams or Secured Redundancy >> RTP Stream. >> >> If one looks on something like ISMAcrypt that operates on a special >> form of packetized encoded streams, i.e. payload created, but not RTP >> headers, we get into further distinctions that we so far haven't >> needed to have. >> >> I don't know how well we must ensure that something like ISMAcrypt is >> clearly defined, because then we do need to split the RTP >> packetization transformation into two parts. >> >> Cheers >> >> Magnus Westerlund >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 >> Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 >> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> avtext mailing list >> avtext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avtext
- [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ie… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ie… Black, David
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ie… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ie… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ie… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext… Bo Burman