IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [GROW] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-07

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Thu, 25 May 2017 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209E3127B52 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twUpz_BnP-pU for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0BF2129BB5 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 7so108340388wmo.1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FHcz+szEvWfAcrXgrK8yQ5FTK4j7C/1qn2PN6w9dMUw=; b=Zxb9zwm8EsQuEQo8SBlPJJ4dlExGYITqY5kqnujoD+zilLSJa4+N/cDX2TgI23EjZJ ijXROkJaTaytADKjH84eagkzdZoFz9spFWiOLykMYzdL/PHWN6tpyNCC2YqRjFPBDpeJ 2sTlF4OXVUkQvQrcnG/ed9kHqJX4eMqGaZE7VoEEV7fVxRafzDYHBZfCRuG6U5b+esN1 AWUYazlbOucDz0V4qQ1oncmqTIRIAM3FW8LPhlFgx7vASWulkImThgkeArSadVDxVaUc mKmwjjhiquEE6LKc/uNvJCxICXilAsLSys4+R8tCal3/8lC6/WKW1HuTUwDUPEXEkN/p KLXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCO/NJuC+W1MAtLIl2IOsrwpmoq+by9PYtoL6qzk3NpFFzdfXSf jFTHbSX7rwoE/xbHeifxMA==
X-Received: by 10.80.170.105 with SMTP id p38mr31249335edc.33.1495751753319; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:a0d4:a036:684a:8eb4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w15sm4707738edw.27.2017.05.25.15.35.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 May 2017 15:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 00:35:51 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: "Hankins, Greg (Nokia - US)" <greg.hankins@nokia.com>
Cc: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject.all@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170525223551.sette6hymir4wsfg@Vurt.local>
References: <20170522110448.3obnrbam2who3n5x@hanna.meerval.net> <87y3topre5.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <20170522222811.GA19849@nokia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170522222811.GA19849@nokia.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/u6lGu3O8SnERDCNfwZ7IhSXP1AA>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [GROW] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 22:35:57 -0000

(trimming receipients)

Dale, are we good, or do we need to go through another iteration?

Kind regards,

Job

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Hankins, Greg (Nokia - US) wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:29:06PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> >I suspect my problems come from not realizing there has been a change of
> >focus.  (It may be much clearer to routing people.)  So I would suggest
> >expanding the title of Appendix A to "Transition Considerations for
> >Vendors of BGP Implementations".
> 
> Hi Dale, how about simply "Transition Considerations for BGP Implementers" as
> there are many excellent FOSS implementations in addition to implementations
> sold by vendors?
> 
> >    For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation
> >    may require a software development and release process that can take
> >    several years.
> >
> >Perhaps "a software development and release" can be omitted.
> 
> Updated: For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation
> may require a process that can take several years.
> 
> >> This document updates [RFC4271] so that routes are neither imported nor
> >> exported unless specifically enabled by configuration.  The solution
> >> reduces the consequences of these problems, and improves the default level
> >> of Internet routing security.
> >
> >In that case, I'd start the second sentence with "This change ..." or
> >perhaps "This update ..." -- nothing has previously been labeled a
> >"solution", so the reader has to search a bit to determine the
> >antecedent.
> 
> Updated: This change reduces the consequences of these problems, and improves
> the default level of Internet routing security.
> 
> We'll wait to send a new diff in case there are further comments.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Greg
> 
> --
> Greg Hankins <greg.hankins@nokia.com>
> Senior Product Manager
> IP/Optical Networks, Nokia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email