[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-10

Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 19 January 2022 21:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, rats@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164262685704.2639.18262252934941907924@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:14:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/uJfSJiH2jjpTrxAlux60VNEDF-0>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-10

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-10
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2022-01-19
IETF LC End Date: 2022-01-19
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This draft is pretty long, describing the workflow for remote attestation of
the integrity of firmware and software installed on network devices that
contain Trusted Platform Modules.

All the description is the procedures are very clear.

Just curious, what if the Trusted Platform Module on the device is compromised?

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None.

Nits/editorial comments:

Thank you
Linda Dunbar

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-r… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review… Lars Eggert