[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-06.txt
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Thu, 01 April 2010 14:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513713A6959 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7itjwkQsbXDR for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5FB3A692C for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o31EmTcx076827; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:48:29 GMT (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201004011448.o31EmTcx076827@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:48:29 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: draft-ietf-radext-status-server.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:48:00 -0000
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-radext-status-server-06.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2010-03-28 IETF LC End Date: 2010-03-29 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready with nits Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: - Abstract page 2: there is an explicit reference to a RFC, this is in general forbidden but IMHO we are here in the allowed exception case. - 2.1.1 page 8: a servers policy -> a server policy - 3 page 10 (twice): etc. -> etc., ??? - 4.2 page 13: adminstrators -> administrators - 4.2 page 15 (twice): e.g. -> e.g., - 4.3 page 16: modelled -> modeled - 4.3 page 16: usually the hysteresis against flapping tries to keep the connection (i.e., failover after 3 missed responses), here it is the opposite. IMHO it is very aggressive but it is how RFC 3539 works so I have no concern about it. - 4.5 page 16: Proxyhas -> Proxy has - 4.5 page 17: cannot, -> cannot - 4.5 page 18: i.e. -> i.e., - 5 page 19: EAP-MEssage -> EAP-Message - 8 page 23: synthesise -> synthesize - 8 page 23: in "the suggestion of [RFC5080] Section 2.2.2, which suggests" suggests -> proposes - 8 page 23: configurably is not in my dict? - 9.2 page 23: IMHO the RFC2119 reference should be moved to normative references section (perhaps others too?) - Authors' Addresses -> Author's Address Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr PS: I apologize for the delay. BTW I've seen a wording comment and proposal from Bernard Aboba, I support it.
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-radext-status-serv… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-radext-status-… Alan DeKok