Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 11 September 2013 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFB621F94FA for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.593
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxCLnaSrpiRf for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF1F21F8EB5 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq15so2770978wib.12 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rzzI02eLQtvvDyP8ds0D4+vgQ7ZZnRAUgdBOmpnUNLg=; b=Sayl6j7qryyPX+qHDJG/F7sU5aZvX06xN9ZAbmw/87at7VfNBFfyI1603IeHUz2Q5j kNKY9UI4oGHj7dEkeGwpeNB03g1hFIUzicNgnx1i5p3KhVCgo8bdhnC1lpZHzWiJhN1l MlZSCui2LYNJWJQ51k2iFMMLUqBpdbI+N6JkqfKQHjxNRApLwmLzkvzcuR839Y/lavon nDZVWbx50neqo4nHPPVNxYmX8xfbiUNQC2PktqwQLlfvw/l3IpkhZB4izyHpVwk+xDz5 GhJoaraduTC74hAj/1FrNQRnLxcz1jvnMIgCDJ+/LjqNoA1M9rQCju5PEZHC+Topq5pN bTZg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.211.19 with SMTP id my19mr3234138wic.19.1378939608939; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.106.169 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACvMsLENvekjQS7M_7jfA53o3Km39L7w=nAtYh5p61bNW_WU5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACvMsLENvekjQS7M_7jfA53o3Km39L7w=nAtYh5p61bNW_WU5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:46:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaKFbDAU+aaurhO9n4dDnGi1kHq9yXbuBYHD6ueYW+onQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c385568ec38804e623653d"
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:46:51 -0000

Hi Pete,

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09
> Reviewer:  Peter McCann
> Review Date: 2013-09-11
> IETF LC End Date:
> IESG Telechat date: 2013-09-12
>
> Summary: Ready
>
> Major issues:  None
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Might want to point out that the "Application type" appears as the
> "context" from the media-type document.
>

I think that's spelled out in the media-type document already, is it not?


> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> There is an extra ">" in the description of the "abusive" assertion.
>

Fixed, thanks!

-MSK