[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC Review: draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-01.txt
"Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> Sun, 19 August 2007 23:38 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMuM9-00088o-K3; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:38:53 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IMuM8-00088e-9T for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:38:52 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMuM7-00088U-V4 for gen-art@ietf.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:38:52 -0400
Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.70]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMuM7-0004XA-K7 for gen-art@ietf.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:38:51 -0400
Received: from [71.254.29.97] (helo=JMHLap3.stevecrocker.com) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1IMuM5-0005Xj-TT; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:38:50 -0400
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:38:35 -0400
To: Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>
In-Reply-To: <E3F9D87C63E2774390FE67C924EC99BB1B90FACC@zrc2hxm1.corp.nor tel.com>
References: <E3F9D87C63E2774390FE67C924EC99BB1B90FACC@zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <E1IMuM5-0005Xj-TT@elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
X-ELNK-Trace: 9f083ca8aeb2d326d5a073bfd238dd844d2b10475b571120a1628f50ea16b51205d95bb77770640e9fb03c1163eaca27350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 71.254.29.97
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Cc: Robert Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC Review: draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft IPv6 Router Advertisement Flags Option (for background on Gen-ART, please seehttp://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-01.txt Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 19-August-2007 IETF LC End Date: 2007-08-31 IESG Telechat date: (if known) 2007-09-06 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a proposed standard. I would change the length handling text a bit if I were writing it, so I have included that suggestion as part of my comments. There is a good chance that in this particular case all of my comments below are too picky, but they are provided for the information of the general area chair. Comments: As a general observation, it is usually a bad idea for chairs to be authors of documents in their working group. If we really don't have enough active participants in the IPv6 working group to get someone else to write this, we have a much larger problem. The document says that the length of the option is 1. This is in multiples of 8 octets, so there is lots of room. However, the text explicitly says that the length should be checked in case of future expansion. But it does not specify what to do if the length is not 1. I would recommend that the text explicitly allow for lengths greater than 1, and simply indicate that bits past those understood by the receiver are too be ignored. There could probably also be a sentence indicating that since bits are to be defined in order, this allows a receiver to properly recognize the bits it understands. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 16 A… Mary Barnes
- [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC Review: draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-f… Joel M. Halpern
- [Gen-art] Re: Gen-Art LC Review: draft-ietf-ipv6-… Bob Hinden
- [Gen-art] Re:Gen-Art LC Review: draft-ietf-ipv6-r… Brian Haberman