RE: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-mule-ietf-cablelabs-collaboration-03.txt

"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortel.com> Thu, 22 March 2007 18:09 UTC

Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HURjO-0005Su-Up; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:09:46 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HURjN-0005PI-GV for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:09:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HURjN-0005Oq-5Q for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:09:45 -0400
Received: from zcars04f.nortel.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HURjJ-0004HM-Hw for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:09:45 -0400
Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com [47.129.230.99]) by zcars04f.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id l2MI9B717380; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:09:12 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-mule-ietf-cablelabs-collaboration-03.txt
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:08:33 -0400
Message-ID: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B40E16822B@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
In-reply-to: <45FE2100.7050000@zurich.ibm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-mule-ietf-cablelabs-collaboration-03.txt
Thread-Index: Acdp6HgeIUMfRyexQ+qbUrAtxsve/QCxJ1lA
References: <E3F9D87C63E2774390FE67C924EC99BB16E7969D@zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com> <7.0.1.0.0.20070318214434.03a3b8d8@stevecrocker.com> <45FE2100.7050000@zurich.ibm.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortel.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
Cc: jari.arkko@piuha.net, gen-art@ietf.org, mark@townsley.net, jf.mule@cablelabs.com
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

We could meet earlier? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brc@zurich.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 1:35 AM
To: Joel M. Halpern
Cc: mark@townsley.net; gen-art@ietf.org; jari.arkko@piuha.net;
jf.mule@cablelabs.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] LC review:
draft-mule-ietf-cablelabs-collaboration-03.txt

Hard-won compromise, I would guess. We have a recurrent problem in
persuading other organizations that we *really* mean it when we say that
participation is individual. Similar issues arose in
draft-andersson-rtg-gmpls-change, which was finally approved yesterday.

      Brian

On 2007-03-19 02:59, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) 
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see 
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
> you may receive.
> 
> 
> Document: CableLabs - IETF Standardization Collaboration
> Reviewer:  Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date:  March 18, 2007
> IETF LC End Date: March 15, 2007?
> IESG Telechat date: (2007-04-05
> 
> Summary: This document seems nearly ready for publication as an 
> Informational RFC.
> 
> Comments:
>         Section 4 on participation in the IETF Process seems to be 
> worded in a way that suggests that "individuals who also represent ...
> CableLabs" will be participating in IETF meetings in part "in order to

> assist the IETF in refining its understanding of Cablelabs 
> requirements."  This seems to take us down the path of explicit 
> representatives who can not change their position as individuals.  I 
> don't think that is the intent, but it probably should be clarified.
>         Section 5 also raises teh vision of "CableLabs activities 
> within the IETF."  Again, only individuals can participate.  The 
> Liaison statements are fine.  It is the implication of another level 
> of interaction that raises question.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art