[Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-05
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 14 September 2015 20:36 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80221B566F; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fqFKuR7-KZZW; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910AA1B5665; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t8EKa66a057201 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:36:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local
To: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <55E75637.9030800@nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <55F72FB1.9090306@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:36:01 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55E75637.9030800@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/wbDIJm8NoriBn27rDfeAtpjlJs4>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 20:36:09 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 14 Sep 2015 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 17 Sep 2015 Summary: (still) Ready for publication as Proposed Standard Thanks for the improvements in -05. On 9/2/15 3:04 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2 Sep 2015 > IETF LC End Date: 9 Sep 2015 > IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard > > One thing I'd like to check, and I suspect this pokes at a > conversation that has already happened (as hinted in the > acknowledgements section): > > The discussion of managements systems having to deal with a 64 bit > wavelength label caught my eye. This is an RFC3471 section 3.2.1.1 > label isn't it? That document shows wavelength labels as 32 bit > things. Has something updated 3471 to say to expect a multiple of 32 > bits, and not 32 bits specifically? If not, maybe this document would > be a good place to do so explicitly, rather than what appears to be > fiat at the moment? > > micro-nit: at the end of the introduction "in that regard" suggests > the document updates the work of the ITU-T in some other regard? I > suggest simple deleting the phrase. > > > >
- [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-fle… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Gen-art] [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ie… julien.meuric
- Re: [Gen-art] [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ie… Daniele Ceccarelli
- [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-cca… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf… Jari Arkko