IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 24 August 2017 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78E3132139; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qti.qualcomm.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ho0TVXxO46pO; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B12B132113; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1503604781; x=1535140781; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=41aNnkWn+WRaU8WXKuKboglJOey8kwAuT8szHJsJF2Q=; b=PffKMUVfJdYVeeGJNGygxSIJOoFzEBP5yjJR6X2h4E2Cb0HP+Hp9IxR0 LObt+Lm4C60R5HPywqH+oRbbN3MrdrqsjiCnuG0bUfyU2z+GvlutyyHGQ m4yZTj9LNFroCeWD4jVlOdLh2JPaUZR/PzkefptsJ3Se5D3fku49HVYEw M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,422,1498546800"; d="scan'208,217";a="113511021"
Received: from unknown (HELO Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.108]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2017 12:59:40 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5900,7806,8633"; a="1479877812"
X-MGA-submission: MDHBa1FrrHdawzqzBv7m7wycZz+RNWpflx2q/MPr9k/chlZxWTMWZXqDMeIkOhG6/9Jp9p60jSBl71lUdGi+n/ikEnoADl1Xi4PZrpFK2qYGY+/jFxW1aJJhSzJ64auZicGiL7J9Ke62zxjQeteLrVHW
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 24 Aug 2017 12:59:39 -0700
Received: from [10.110.41.50] (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:59:39 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
CC: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:59:37 -0500
Message-ID: <FD0F68BB-E3AE-42CE-BA08-CF4F9827953F@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5C474D6.C37C9%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D5C474D6.C37C9%acee@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_601E3A86-581B-4610-AD51-3F633A67ABF6_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01E.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.31) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/wxAXS8g8GUcL9TTVcgO92aZEvVI>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 19:59:43 -0000

On 24 Aug 2017, at 11:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:

>>>> For 1, 2, 6, and 7, that's easy; the drafts defining the values can 
>>>> do
>>>> the registrations. For 5, the reference would be to an existing RFC
>>>> that doesn't do the registration. I'm not sure what to do about 
>>>> that;
>>>> perhaps register it here and make the reference both 5640 and this
>>> document.
>
> Actually, this document does assign these code points in the registry 
> so
> “This document” is appropriate. The value portion of these TLVs 
> just
> happened to be described via a reference rather than text.

There is nothing preventing the IANA registry from having useful 
information. :-) Yes, this document registers it, but really what the 
implementer is going to need is this document *and* 5640, so I see no 
particular harm in putting both references in the registry, and it's 
probably useful.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email