IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 10 May 2013 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B6921F871C; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35uAp+djjH17; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x235.google.com (mail-ia0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D3621F86BB; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f181.google.com with SMTP id f27so4895301iae.26 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EJ2AfnDAPi4SEvRs54lKASllD7RywbFqg465zkTjASo=; b=VI3nPqMjqwbnYAAUU0RPAB9kOPhnO6v9bC4J9hkq3KITLuPLPilCFi2mWokb5sfNqU I1EuwvSvtycS1VL+K8S39P8WAn7ev5O93vNSRRdPA/HrUw8EX/bjZ9VsMUsH75bXhQGL oRohPgagq7ScqSykc84c8vx1bcG2A0XseE+MY22PCWFzay6ZY8J5oQaDJoRjV+Q5M4XU hMeXZl9tcz+9zeT9g2X43RAdSYOxYcYkuHqmmewRwDHfu6Xvuyq75EoCQAVoY/lMjoFy scEdO3zlhZjtYIhQKs1tKUN6G6RWysD79RR5a/CgKPxPLQ2QOdzHOs/8lfVYiAias6+F rvhQ==
X-Received: by 10.42.168.198 with SMTP id x6mr8274651icy.45.1368214505068; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (122-60-170-151.jetstream.xtra.co.nz. [122.60.170.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lr1sm6051138igb.6.2013.05.10.12.35.00 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2013 12:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <518D4BF0.8030307@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 07:35:12 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stig Venaas <stig@cisco.com>
References: <5159F239.1060001@nostrum.com> <517FF231.3080700@nostrum.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D700926@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <518D0E64.6020504@nostrum.com> <518D2728.9000606@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <518D2728.9000606@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>, "renum@ietf.org" <renum@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:35:06 -0000

On 11/05/2013 04:58, Stig Venaas wrote:
> On 5/10/2013 8:12 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> Thanks Bing -
>>
>> The updates make the document better, and I appreciate the resolution of
>> referencing Tim's expired draft.
> 
> So the solution is to not reference it? I see the name of the draft is
> mentioned in the acknowledgments as:
>  [draft-chown-v6ops-renumber-thinkabout].
> 
> Shouldn't it then be an informational reference? It doesn't make sense
> to me to mention a draft in the text and not have a reference.

YMMV, but I expect the RFC Editor will resolve this.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email