Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-21
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 22 May 2015 14:08 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAF61A1BB1 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ja3wJhH6k72C for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FFD61AD369 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t4ME8Psq073059 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 09:08:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <555F3855.6070900@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 09:08:21 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gen-art@ietf.org
References: <555E439E.1080703@nostrum.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5CA376CF@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <555F2FE3.1070003@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <555F2FE3.1070003@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/x5MUk7uTnGQIS8dncb09J9eABXo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-21
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:08:42 -0000
On 5/22/15 8:32 AM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: > Hi Dan, > > 2015-06-03 is the correct deadline. > > I'm wondering about the time machines, though. The last call date for > draft-ietf-rtcweb-video is now a week after the telechat, and the > draft is still on the telechat. It looks like the original last call ended 28May, but was extended to call out the downref to 6386. I can see an AD leaving the draft on the 28May telechat in that circumstance - the IESG and directorates should have had enough time to evaluate. If you find you don't, just tell Alissa, and I'm sure she'll adjust. > > > Thanks! > > Jean > > On 5/22/15 4:27 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: >> Hi Jean, >> >> I assume that you mean >> >>> Dan Romascanu 2015-06-03 draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22 >> (and not 2015-05-03) >> >> Otherwise, GenArt needs to provide time machines to its members :-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Dan >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of A. Jean >>> Mahoney >>> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:44 PM >>> To: General Area Review Team >>> Subject: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-21 >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The following reviewers have assignments: >>> >>> Reviewer LC end Draft >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Alexey Melnikov 2015-06-01 draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11 >>> >>> Brian Carpenter 2015-06-01 >>> draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01 >>> >>> Christer Holmberg 2015-06-03 draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04 >>> >>> Dan Romascanu 2015-05-03 draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22 >>> >>> Wassim Haddad 2015-06-01 draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-08 >>> >>> >>> I have made the assignments in the review tool: >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- >>> 3A__art.tools.ietf.org_tools_art_genart_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1S >>> giZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=IYbHvu9q >>> v5Z3Qjx5qOVLUjVHp0bxjPll7nyVuJYj5TE&s=BlIUJqNNg2IK7KdWGkhsxWCvTl >>> X0yMa1B100kc2es0w&e= >>> >>> And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- >>> 3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_dav_genart_gen- >>> 2Dart.html&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJ >>> fQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=IYbHvu9qv5Z3Qjx5qOVLUjVHp0bxjPll7n >>> yVuJYj5TE&s=WkNpNZV1je8vUr1oi8F1Epd7KP2McHIKI2II3ts69aE&e= >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- >>> 3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_dav_genart_gen-2Dart-2Dby- >>> 2Dreviewer.html&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31O >>> cNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=IYbHvu9qv5Z3Qjx5qOVLUjVHp0b >>> xjPll7nyVuJYj5TE&s=m0sFwxR21KO1Gpn1u4k6xEJU9wvGlY7oDorQEmcjDjc& >>> e= >>> >>> The standard template is included below. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jean >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>> Gen- >>> ART, please see the FAQ at >>> >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- >>> 3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=AwICAg&c=BFp >>> WQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsF >>> A&m=IYbHvu9qv5Z3Qjx5qOVLUjVHp0bxjPll7nyVuJYj5TE&s=7nLlZ3H8RPnsaLs >>> iVUOJKpuLzI0n5kWsbvk3uYUytiM&e= >. >>> >>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call >>> comments you >>> may receive. >>> >>> Document: >>> Reviewer: >>> Review Date: >>> IETF LC End Date: >>> IESG Telechat date: (if known) >>> >>> Summary: >>> >>> Major issues: >>> >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> Nits/editorial comments: >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gen-art mailing list >>> Gen-art@ietf.org >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- >>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_gen- >>> 2Dart&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvl >>> siLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=IYbHvu9qv5Z3Qjx5qOVLUjVHp0bxjPll7nyVuJ >>> Yj5TE&s=rKNxUR6SE9lfeU4pVU3q7OHt-bkqZALsEiC8acr8nyk&e= > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015… A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - … Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - … A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - … Robert Sparks