[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-03.txt

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 01 October 2007 19:45 UTC

Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcRDI-0005ZQ-PQ; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:45:56 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IcRDH-0005Yy-8y for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:45:55 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcRDG-0005Fv-Um for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:45:54 -0400
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com ([135.245.0.33]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcRCv-0003wj-CM for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:45:33 -0400
Received: from ihmail.ih.lucent.com (h135-1-218-70.lucent.com [135.1.218.70]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id l91JjD7Q028530; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:45:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [135.185.244.90] (il0015vkg1.ih.lucent.com [135.185.244.90]) by ihmail.ih.lucent.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l91Jj7j00988; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:45:07 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <47014E42.4020409@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:45:06 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Bell Labs Security Technology Research Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <47006D93.1080105@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <47006D93.1080105@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Cc: RjS@estacado.net, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, cboulton@ubiquitysoftware.com, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Summary: Ready except for one tricky point
> Comments: 
> 
> This is clear and easy to understand. Unfortunately, the

Brian: Thank you for the review (it's my turn to be on the
receiving side of a Gen-ART comment ;-) )

[...]
> Because of this old ABNF error, it's long been unclear whether
> the format with ::: should be tolerated, but the format
> with :: certainly must be considered as standard, per RFC 4291.
> 
> Ideally, RFC 3261 needs fixing. As far as torture tests go,
> please consider adding at least one case testing that *both*
> the above constructs are tolerated. Otherwise, I could imagine
> highly obscure operational mysteries ahead.

This is very interesting.  Sure, I will add the additional
test case as you indicate into the next revision.  I will
intimate you when I release a new revision for specific comments
on the new test case.

Thanks, once again.

Regards,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art