[Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-ieprep-domain-req-05.txt

Sorry, this was a review of draft-ietf-ieprep-domain-req-05.txt.  I
forgot to change the subject line.

> I'm going to assume everyone knows about gen-art.
> 
> No objection.  I don't see anything wrong with the listed
> requirements, modulo the one question below -- in fact they seem to be
> pretty good.  However, I really can't tell if there are requirements
> that have been omitted, since I'm not in the area.  
> 
> >    Any application layer label mechanisms used to support ETS MUST be
> >    capable of supporting both the set of ETS and non-ETS (presumably,
> >    normal) users.
> 
> I'm not sure about this one, perhaps because I don't understand what
> it means.  I can envision, for example, applications that are only
> used in ETS situations, and are only capable of running with ETS
> labels.  Are they disallowed?  No special apps?  
> 
> I can see a requirement that any application which is used during
> normal times must still be usable during "medium emergencies".  Is
> that the goal?
> 
> 
> Also a nit in case there is another version ...
> 
> >    If proxies take such action, then the security measures discussed in
> >    [rfc3689] MUST be considered.  More discussion about security in the
> >    single domain context is discussed in section 5.
> 
> You don't mean to say that the discussion is discussed. :-)
> 
> swb

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art