Re: [Gen-art] [Lwip] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-10

Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Fri, 30 October 2020 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E793A0CE4; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS=1.927, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ItwPjf7IahwL; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dash.upc.es (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07FA73A0CDF; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.40.4]) by dash.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id 09U8PeK2008055; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:25:41 +0100
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80181D53C1; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:25:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 83.38.106.121 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:25:40 +0100
Message-ID: <77ffd660179e5de3833b7255e1b04bc2.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <7CBC0201-079F-4DE9-BDA8-311D04C96C91@cooperw.in>
References: <160096886489.2330.10263440081874090089@ietfa.amsl.com> <7CBC0201-079F-4DE9-BDA8-311D04C96C91@cooperw.in>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:25:40 +0100
From: "Carles Gomez Montenegro" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: "Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: "Linda Dunbar" <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, lwip@ietf.org, "IETF Gen-ART" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks.all@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at dash
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:59:19 by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:25:41 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zSj-aMlqGk5vIVd6X-fs0oBZL0Y>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Lwip] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:25:57 -0000

Hi Alissa, and Linda,

Thank you very much for your reviews!

Based on Alissa's message, we understand that no update is required
regarding Linda's comments.

Thanks,

Carles (on behalf of the authors)


> Linda, thanks for your review. I think on both points you raise what the
> document proposes is well supported given the use case. I entered a No
> Objection ballot.
>
> Alissa
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 1:34 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
>> <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-10
>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
>> Review Date: 2020-09-24
>> IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-30
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>
>> Summary:
>> This document describes the guidance on how to configure TCP parameters
>> in the
>> Constrained-Node-Networks.
>>
>> Major issues:
>> 4.1.2. recommends ECN to be used  in the Constrained Node networks. In
>> any
>> network, especially when many IoT devices are attached , the congestion
>> can be
>> very short lived. Having Constrained node supporting ECN can cause
>> traffic
>> oscillation.  In addition, not many deployed internet supports ECN, it
>> can be
>> waste of processing of the CNN nodes.
>>
>> Section 4.1.1 recommend packet size to be 1280 for IPv6 to avoid the
>> need to
>> support Path MTU Discovery. it is problematic.  There are many layers of
>> tunneling and encapsulation in today's network, (let's not even assume
>> SR), the
>> actual packet size can be much larger.  Supporting Path MTU Discovery is
>> far
>> less processing intensive than supporting ECN.
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Linda Dunbar
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
>