[Gendispatch] Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions-00.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 22 July 2026 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B30711BFA5DB for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1784706419; bh=N4PvzfWEBh5nYY2/j2eHuTla6w4D9bLI45m/Qrqt4D8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=q4JvgfIxE4I1y0S7Bvcy4w23Jx0kurqGP97qk0lUTYEY9J/MirRKUhb33oJc+v+F3 3eQv4aQJnwNkZtEb9auKVKVaJvzcJQgUTkLleiPVxIONAJiIGq9OaR7nbvn/zK+6Uq YLYhCn9YDlmfPl4pYHaqyylsk5WpzrmdXtmvccXA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="gCLfpfmX"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="SoWOwr8H"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSS3kOEgl2xn for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout-b3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b3-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11D411BFA5D6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D251D000FD; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 03:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Jul 2026 03:46:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1784706412; x=1784792812; bh=mPpNeSwZ2QnxSeHsDo6c0Nhr0GY4lFmEt9tuYzSTEu8=; b= gCLfpfmXh0sNEHQ9p3GQQrLkH2xr9ahoPscMrhIJ/tBS7UO/gnyT5hNjAjfi6Q9T 8FLwfbdlLmpobuw1TZtNoUe0yPu9D/F3noq0DArUGF7YNDEc3F0Y4+JE5kc14/wl oRlqh3oJOUs3hpZmTd5/k6vGtRvivLrM1sfpo8LUSK2yiWKLBpx5GCV3ivie95it XKO/Y5YKwk9XLPoEImx/7Q6XQe3f6slxMKrqWvlu+an+Lxg6hYPVeQO11ON1nVCX o1oYiSPKrvSUqPb6/RCLK01cCyk0bIK/PgrlqHC4KUbDYEyjyJToy64+eKY/YoP0 lmDoi74vE+MvuZYwpNgNgg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1784706412; x= 1784792812; bh=mPpNeSwZ2QnxSeHsDo6c0Nhr0GY4lFmEt9tuYzSTEu8=; b=S oWOwr8HoNTuCv8Kipion5CVgpO1QK7Uk9t9LuJgI6t9erGBBS2QMiLfrix8UKyBj Kel9BtGF0hD0HYflO48lrSQlQUQcO8WFAuumwNmi2HW0Lm7JJSfBhtllMWmcSrDA 4f0yzEIM5Ls6n+4924iApVaTZRGEe4xgrSUy1czaoNKbam3RJsMeNDcYitsXqHD0 4uFK0s4HQ3rIgRy/y407VuEjh72UIRUAmYOnO3rhdnnBr7DFhCMoi4enqsCVi7Xv J0El/+AHgbGFIcZjebNqMQ1h3DazMAfc+cxqNB0j+l3hMoRDgs2v8Paow5qgAvM8 VC4qUPdp5mwF7GWZZgWaw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:a3VgajyhLPumheI_7HEdk1nN4k33kcPAshCRm0pDYafTaI6jIdoK3A> <xme:a3Vgavl5xFN-lJTAv-ns8d7GaovvhpNC0_ylW05AKtEaKk4E9JlrBhuf9wi4e-_5Y CEANqMba1YQsE16-Y24Bd3q74fM5TmVWsxW5CRcKH34LoL5DlpvOQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:a3VgasdXXmvrPTN7jutUdDOn_NKIYYgk3DsxvI9gyykvfa6Ayslr7kX17IO4KqLZ6w83HOOOncMY8FAO8KtBq5YW1bxGyiXgHIE>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTExONSGe6Kd+teChbwizRwTi7eHiVB9u3vWH5p837EsdV3D+qy5p5Or+EJ0lggeiA SYVgRiktBxJniI0FJCP4uCkwoix7g3bX3x/XAtxypRr1r6ylJpfI4abNwcn+E4NJczSIUF kFXwdqzlOsi9xvaR1RwUSfx3xRA0U9Cy66ly67cAFDBsURZ41MV8fzikwdDJ/xjhDtHYeI 2hQ2lV7dBXvI2gGdqWRNLwmdrrXjLH2OpmZyRZ4vvf3TM6wwpasCXSj1C7uSFxMh3Mf8EG pGnqtxRt0qit2u080bTiQ4mtMBAeNKAn1h73UXAuOsRUiB64NWWzJIaJCEu4ZpKse6lNVb 2VhoP/jBJ74NXuchP41oLctkAxNq4cQ5oN7jDvKzcLOdTWvtds0vcQYisIqZcLJDnVGS50 GyV0d+fghitCTl5BEA8FSfqcRA6Q92d2lttrIjrnflLvxNfzPjT0EqlaMVJYfU3/nCio3R 9rxRa7JE2ESIpAts8xq/4ZJcW4KP1kVV2IAYFxuSW1L9eDxnvZkiDt5TxTlZjk83VtYCse y1VPcNgKVH4pBkC7KYlvKkg4ESqKG2ZVczxfluyVhsCIEbHw3jKhyLCtafvaGGA4/e+R9H kG3zYi2lkaEr/W6jdYNn30QN8dI5oRlCbpVws438Qe6rmfDEP/WhWEK1FWiQ
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:a3VgalohTqnRHyOUszfhYw9MGvI1AxwWR2KZ6aAeKLR3_Kt8uLrLrA> <xmx:a3Vgaq4XsUfpjVHHFPvGqBdF3RScFCVrtytWo4VpevshJqAQLyxP0g> <xmx:a3Vgarrs30L7eEog2FBPXS6fJmg5p-EcTct-NeL2nQ6WH8wot7EAlw> <xmx:a3Vgashi4JkrsEhXGF8pqQB3UPBKCu5-sA9CxPtHQwTeLDsiYBp3vg> <xmx:bHVgagPG7ExlOLQx1Bg8EtMCHf68S5cjbHCryMoF0Z8xHACmyV_I9gbO>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 03:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.600.51.1.1\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <9a14d92b-cd7a-44be-ae0e-025528b29e0b@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:46:48 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1781911C-7CCA-4B9D-BDE6-BD21A5ADA1A4@mnot.net>
References: <178466333881.355481.1001762120519431735@dt-datatracker-d4d6ff9d9-fsx7d> <9D2F3344-9324-4C09-ABC2-2298FE104F60@mnot.net> <9a14d92b-cd7a-44be-ae0e-025528b29e0b@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.600.51.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: ZU5FOOBCRDEQIJTYI2EGOGPVLH2KE4HS
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZU5FOOBCRDEQIJTYI2EGOGPVLH2KE4HS
X-MailFrom: mnot@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions-00.txt
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/9bwqiUbAD22eVX4q415YYHeEStQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>

Hey Brian,

I hear you re the third rail. My inclination is that it'd be better to have improved documentation than have groups continue to trip over it. 

This is very much a starting point and we know it isn't complete -- it's the product of less than a day of consideration. If there's appetite we can try to address the harder problems.

Cheers,


> On 22 Jul 2026, at 9:43 am, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hmm. I am inclined to say: don't touch the 3rd rail, it is definitely electrified.
> 
> Specifically, section 2.3. "Handling Objections" doesn't seem to me to handle the hard case: an objection has a clear technical basis, has significant support in the group, but clearly only from a minority of participants. We don't vote and we don't have rough consensus.
> 
> Section 2.3 seems to describe a short extract from the resulting infinite loop ("the proposal must be revised... or the decision deferred").
> 
> That aside, the draft seems right, but it seems to leave the hard problem intact.
> 
> Regards/Ngā mihi
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 22-Jul-26 07:49, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Hello,
>> After some discussion this week, Pete and I have put together a draft that we'd like to share with others for consideration. It is by no means complete (or even necessarily correct), but discussing it might help us make progress.
>> If there's time for an initial discussion in GENDISPATCH this week we would welcome that, but of course we would completely understand if it's not possible.
>> Cheers,
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> *From: *internet-drafts@ietf.org
>>> *Subject: **New Version Notification for draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions-00.txt*
>>> *Date: *21 July 2026 at 9:48:58 pm GMT+2
>>> *To: *"Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net>
>>> 
>>> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions-00.txt has been
>>> successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> Name:     draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions
>>> Revision: 00
>>> Title:    Making Decisions in the IETF
>>> Date:     2026-07-21
>>> Group:    Individual Submission
>>> Pages:    10
>>> URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions-00.txt
>>> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions/
>>> HTML:     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions-00.html
>>> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> 
>>>   This document specifies Best Current Practice for making decisions
>>>   within the IETF process.
>>> 
>>>   It updates Section 3.3 of [RFC2418].
>>> 
>>> About This Document
>>> 
>>>   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
>>> 
>>>   Status information for this document may be found at
>>>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottnick-ietf-decisions/.
>>> 
>>>   information can be found at https://projects.mnot.net/I-D/.
>>> 
>>>   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
>>>   https://github.com/mnot/I-D/labels/SHORT.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>> 
>>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://mnot.net/

--
Mark Nottingham   https://mnot.net/