[Gendispatch] Please drop PROCON from this discussion Re: [procon] [Gendispatch] Derivative Works: draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative-01
"Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Thu, 16 July 2026 22:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BB311819AFB; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1784240268; bh=o7B+Wwa4RRqpCPfhxuJa8WC8ctINCoaNP/llmw2zhQc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=nhhs/sOWXpnou16IkUp2BwM8N6eg1rUWJWkG5iz5uzflaTfmaSpdO368fR2rsJQbL Ako2gdqQuYLS1aHDVVUoEhUQC+CAnao3txJSqC2niqTzO9hNUY03ltdJ7DCrHwYsLb TtVAIHnCpmOY2Ni+BP53GmUvxLVuXqwVS/JnuNXc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1HhdnDZp16hE; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from common.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (common.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.38]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1532011819AF4; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96837E1D5B; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a218.dreamhost.com (100-103-104-118.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.103.104.118]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5BFD27E1F3E; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Continue-Gusty: 1196e11b442158ea_1784240258609_2009153743
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1784240258609:1570949080
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1784240258609
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a218.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.103.104.118 (trex/8.0.2); Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:17:38 +0000
Received: from [192.168.50.223] (unknown [134.195.32.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ldaigle@thinkingcat.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a218.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4h1S8d3twhz2M; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; s=dreamhost; t=1784240258; bh=V7ljfP9rr2nF6V/rAK4wNB3De1V9tL0VA+2TFSE29Tw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Content-Type; b=nAOSMa7ox/uDHOkmcO70+XgT/qAK44WbbJbLWXucIhXwxmETizPVBdrRRY8r/Grdf 4L2Ykr9hdvYQokU/1oVKaZeW7BkzD4pn2sByJcCPaLwnxk1gGn7GD5rDniemb+WIyZ W124Ct8qTpp4AgM9QTz6uC9jw9ZK7dz1zTbZoXc5gM+IdAyW86xroOAVpg2H/6ufje wxeC/uAIr+o2aTcnuuwGllOOlFMnVPiHb6hbijya5S0yCWeeZPqXD9idBCvVcvhR3X v8GU+PODepVdb6Sc2gDApYPTzYcsuGEw4p3EEaSFooBFxlczNISMjV8/mZaddA790+ Fny8ckOy5inBQ==
From: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: Process Enthusiasts <procon@ietf.org>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:17:35 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate Free Mode (2.0r6203)
Message-ID: <F3EE6062-53D8-4D0D-AD9B-B0954559E653@thinkingcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_9202F5E8-2282-4207-BBB5-22AB9F845ED5_="
Message-ID-Hash: KB6PUULGR2EJI73ID4Q6JY7YSZYKKD2H
X-Message-ID-Hash: KB6PUULGR2EJI73ID4Q6JY7YSZYKKD2H
X-MailFrom: ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Please drop PROCON from this discussion Re: [procon] [Gendispatch] Derivative Works: draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative-01
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/Ba4iuUaC2jOeIxraaFD50oTqerU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>
Hi, I’m deliberately going up-thread because my request is to the substance of the document in question: this (draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative) document, and from my reading of it, the discussion in the ensuing thread, are not addressing or advancing currently chartered PROCON work. We have a deliberately-focused charter, with significant issues to work on that ARE in charter, we can’t take distracting discussions of non-chartered work at this time. So, I’m going to ask everyone to please drop PROCON from further discussion of this document/topic. Thanks, Leslie. PROCON co-chair. On 17 May 2026, at 19:09, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hi Rob et al, > > Late to the discussion. My initial reaction is that while it's nice to > clarify things, this may not really change anything -- exercising the > derivative works clause in the license doesn't (and can't) limit fair > use, which quoting, etc. for the purpose of discussion presumably > falls under. > > Have you brought this in front of a lawyer? > > Cheers, > > > > >> On 18 May 2026, at 8:55 am, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello Process Enthusiasts, >> >> We have a new draft available. Brian Carpenter cleaned up the -00 >> version, and now we have something that I think we can all get on >> board with. >> >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i-d-announce/BIa9m6rovETUBl3wlb8Zq3xRTA4/ >> >> Derivative Works >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative-01.html >> >> The GitHub URL is below, if you wish to engage there: >> https://github.com/sayrer/derivative-works >> >> thanks, >> Rob >> -- >> Gendispatch mailing list -- gendispatch@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to gendispatch-leave@ietf.org > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > procon mailing list -- procon@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to procon-leave@ietf.org -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Leslie Daigle Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises ldaigle@thinkingcat.com -------------------------------------------------------------------
- [Gendispatch] Please drop PROCON from this discus… Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)