Re: [Gendispatch] Internet-Drafts Don't Expire

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 26 November 2019 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B1A120AFE for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:31:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fRgl1gT-nbUj for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:31:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF0B3120AFA for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:31:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41453769; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:31:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:31:55 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Cv4khRk3ttEdQw8Elm+apQ/b3bSWVVQzJQERTksuI LE=; b=P+3GXrJTyO6OtlVSiWgnIQtaGfh6DZDA5RL1goB9xCT+UqOpLLkIxQRja zX3sX3CCNMuPHtkCtvCnGM00tcEXBuLUZCbovu9cJ2YRR1qZ/A9nLrV5zGosY35Z p9eVA5tH0umo4BS2l9wMSvk3irZXLM9QJXlb6wy/fs00CUGzioUjvzh2eZaUT8O7 buzj0rL/p+ZROEKpQRBZ56b6kJKAFwsYW/esGWR7VoPulisv3TT0pFHDEfJEAuiM yiJXwZpuvg3BwOTwrsZB1s+hEvRcr/5b/mkSTjMED7v8NLLhtHOpYnoQIDoi7Mvt Hc7qvbUR2GAiUJ7qRnfXZs67ekPvg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2qfdXf7BJ6thHKrYWZxUvv8mFEPXuWdf8OhLZoA6e7hleqOhrWwLkw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudeifedgudeifecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrd duheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgv rhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2qfdXRLOqiGlG6bCMy9S_gkqRQu3-hIQfaiIsvvUTiHbIfV9pGtWNw> <xmx:2qfdXQFyXnu-sl6ZSioyJAUlBzCuuS1JWn-8tF5jUNMaba8vMom4WQ> <xmx:2qfdXQeirssV0OUg4um1aE04hsYyg6wPuMzg1eXjxpIG2f_3e_d_YA> <xmx:2qfdXeFMyVcV6tgOAYZBMT9Bz7laUdlhiPia7MVVh7OfXfpgt73fpw>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4020E306005F; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:31:54 -0500 (EST)
To: gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+LwjjSAK8YLDbnhX9k8jYHz58GazvbGy2Cna=EgZyH=b22A@mail.gmail.com> <95bf9a55-805e-db7d-1bf5-23d9daaa25ec@gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <7a445ede-6dfb-9642-218d-952f0ac4511a@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:31:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <95bf9a55-805e-db7d-1bf5-23d9daaa25ec@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/_3rvB2ywj5aKCwT0qca50V4QU1I>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Internet-Drafts Don't Expire
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:31:57 -0000

On 11/26/19 2:26 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> None. Since expired documents are available for ever, there is absolutely no point in "refreshing" a draft with no changes except the date.

It's been my experience that expired I-Ds are not taken as serious 
proposals; that renewing an I-D even with minor changes provides some 
indication that a draft is still being maintained; and that this is a 
useful if somewhat imprecise metric.

So I'm opposed to eliminating expiration dates on I-Ds.   I think it's 
an example of action bias that requires a significant amount of work to 
accomplish nothing useful.

Keith

p.s. OTOH, if we had the idea to set up some new kind of document that 
is a living document, subject to continuous modification, but with a 
mechanism to take snapshots and cite them, I might be in favor of 
that.   Even better would be if such documents were editable via an 
etherpad-like mechanism, and authors/editors never had to deal with xml2rfc.