[Gendispatch] Please take terminology discussion to newly created list
Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Thu, 25 February 2021 19:38 UTC
Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8253C3A1F02 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:38:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRpAFIVMEByZ for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE36D3A1EFF for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6CED7F37E0 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:46 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bts1ORcjv0Q6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.27] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E04ADD7F37C6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:44 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:44 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5769)
Message-ID: <4C07C2F8-F12A-4F2D-84D8-23B202AF042B@episteme.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/eTUkyYtr5iGPn5X8Vj59H9dqtz0>
Subject: [Gendispatch] Please take terminology discussion to newly created list
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:38:50 -0000
Greetings all, As you saw from Alissa's announcement, the new terminology list is set up and ready to go: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology Please move all terminology-related discussions (on the proposed charter, on the assorted documents currently out there, on general issues regarding terminology) over to that list. We understand that some of the issues are intertwined with Fernando and Keith's proposal that is going to be discussed at IETF 110, so we expect there might be some cross-over discussions, but please try to fix your To and Cc fields as appropriate when replying to messages. Thanks, Pete and Francesca
- [Gendispatch] Please take terminology discussion … Pete Resnick