[Gendispatch] Please take terminology discussion to newly created list

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Thu, 25 February 2021 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8253C3A1F02 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:38:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRpAFIVMEByZ for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE36D3A1EFF for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6CED7F37E0 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:46 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bts1ORcjv0Q6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.27] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E04ADD7F37C6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:44 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:38:44 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5769)
Message-ID: <4C07C2F8-F12A-4F2D-84D8-23B202AF042B@episteme.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/eTUkyYtr5iGPn5X8Vj59H9dqtz0>
Subject: [Gendispatch] Please take terminology discussion to newly created list
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:38:50 -0000

Greetings all,

As you saw from Alissa's announcement, the new terminology list is set 
up and ready to go:

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology

Please move all terminology-related discussions (on the proposed 
charter, on the assorted documents currently out there, on general 
issues regarding terminology) over to that list. We understand that some 
of the issues are intertwined with Fernando and Keith's proposal that is 
going to be discussed at IETF 110, so we expect there might be some 
cross-over discussions, but please try to fix your To and Cc fields as 
appropriate when replying to messages.

Thanks,

Pete and Francesca