Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendispatch-no-expiry-00.txt
"Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net> Tue, 05 November 2019 23:14 UTC
Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C82C12087A for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:14:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gidmm7rKhcLV for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4472A120C0E for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F18E933F67A; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:14:29 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TIGG1VOv6zw; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:14:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 149D0933F66F; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:14:22 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org, mt@lowentropy.net
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:14:17 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13r5655)
Message-ID: <E1922906-E8B5-45CF-A107-23DAA14735B2@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <afe1d8ef-979d-6c8f-0fe6-b69a2d3d3f56@gmail.com>
References: <157290645420.13916.12275765354821078575@ietfa.amsl.com> <afe1d8ef-979d-6c8f-0fe6-b69a2d3d3f56@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/pB_Vl0cxfb13QlgJl1xWH8MfSCw>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendispatch-no-expiry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 23:14:36 -0000
Given that Martin isn't subscribed to the gendispatch list, I expect he'll need to be Cc'ed to see this. I have now done so. Martin, shall I take this to mean that you'd like agenda time in Singapore? pr On 4 Nov 2019, at 16:48, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Hi, > > First a major nit: I-D expiry is mandated by RFC2026: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-6.1.2 > The mention in RFC2418 is incidental. > > Then: > >> Forced expiration serves no purpose that is not adequately served by >> the publication date on the document. > > A date of publication alone does not communicate that a draft is > a draft and that, as BCP9 says: > >> * Under no circumstances should an Internet-Draft * >> * be referenced by any paper, report, or Request- * >> * for-Proposal, nor should a vendor claim compliance * >> * with an Internet-Draft. * > > While the choice of 6 months might seem arbitary, the defined > date of expiry IMHO helps to communicate to readers that > a draft is only a draft. And it also acts as a signal that > there might be a lack of momentum behind a proposal, if a > draft has expired without being updated. > > Regards > Brian > > On 05-Nov-19 11:27, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> >> >> Title : Internet-Drafts Don't Expire >> Author : Martin Thomson >> Filename : draft-thomson-gendispatch-no-expiry-00.txt >> Pages : 4 >> Date : 2019-11-04 >> >> Abstract: >> The long-standing insistence that Internet-Drafts carry expiration >> dates is a concept that is no longer necessary. This document >> removes requirements for expiration for Internet-Drafts from RFC >> 2418/BCP 25. >> >> Note to Readers >> >> Discussion of this document takes place on the GENDISPATCH Working >> Group mailing list (gendispatch@ietf.org), which is archived at >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/ [1]. >> >> Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at >> https://github.com/martinthomson/no-expiry [2]. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-gendispatch-no-expiry/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-gendispatch-no-expiry-00 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-gendispatch-no-expiry-00 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I-D-Announce mailing list >> I-D-Announce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >> -- Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ All connections to the world are tenuous at best
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… John Mattsson
- Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-thomson-gendi… Brian E Carpenter