IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-nottingham-discussion-recharter-00.txt

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 20 August 2020 04:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24E43A0B64 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mhY3ew-J3Vbl for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BF33A0B53 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id t4so695777iln.1 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xAU76tJn3hD3kGXZ75v4LduCxld9nMf6ho1i8c4vCd0=; b=AnGTtZ1xAyU18sx229vH1rC730UoZsK54VbAyVbD8tg2wKubp0J3+T2aqW/89DJNf4 ocYmsJ341pkMOnSI6Ya/cKUEsJi/5RR9ioPLcQiUtuotuIaK+8r9Nzh1RrGZa2YEb18k eV7Ymfr/ptngfQ/gXDiXQh4dB5x6vkw4OP1TloNt3HwfeRr6icaES3BsdWoOJ77GsysG kZlQ/Rcm0bcn/EdcrTNVBJb0THF/+HSPduCndEef5P3Ah1v+ve6IueOOOuMyI7wbbopj jYt6Ec6qD9kGa7gvoXpl8/WATAHdHwGkJQW2DCKH99XKeehqGDvhGe7ObDPrhZWwuruU PGvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xAU76tJn3hD3kGXZ75v4LduCxld9nMf6ho1i8c4vCd0=; b=FvWN+9OVt7U0WX84/+7A0XpwTxm1HqCeAhteoY9nBaDz0uWSZ1zof6eHAoh6c739/a blZ54eADlDQgq6Iv6mCZzUkR5pyfw+jGnNO2xvEy2FhPKDyKk7OSFLij8JcVQN4sRoop Wrrr39XEtnuha0izWwSyLwQCuSwYwXLi01rFF8a2MDQkWLYWaaAHyXv6FIsM0zZX1sa0 6Evv9kgrrJ4ePPHlOtfU+N78Zt5p736kIwtMUxgNGaZfD84HNulUg/kIRm3m1G/3KSwV +C96lDp8qZWCqeObTDfh5uRcI4SYlfpiq3WihQQvTbbr30SMyvkSq2fbW6PtCpSgORbT 85Aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309KN8N/MHxFVLBDv2ZgeM/bT/rs23ihfVX/qhlEw1o5yo+F3cs dJasaNt6t0fWEgj1YsXHZfhr2tixUZp1bbjsKE/IZ+hE86M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS2kFUDWpkkk+gsks3qNXEOO0e8yVP/w3FEAkT9fyxoT+Y6RA+2PMvEeiQoEswW3drgU9UB87cxbgXob6GZPM=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c904:: with SMTP id t4mr1175636ilp.257.1597898166852; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159762600034.21012.3531565855695172680@ietfa.amsl.com> <cbcda2fa-5ef2-93a7-6ae6-a78603ad97b8@gmail.com> <48D4FA55-C03F-47D8-B91C-4D14A99829B7@mnot.net> <CAChr6Sx34auWJ3T2T6GueVGqJ6ZzSMOMsWiAVD2Gy9m42RaJyQ@mail.gmail.com> <0BD00993-D007-48E3-ABAE-157CCF0CE2C3@akamai.com> <9d816729-32b8-488e-90be-06dd8510a370@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CAJU8_nUUHt4ms-4kkzUqR+7AJyOOrZ+jCv77wF+TD08pvjD9CA@mail.gmail.com> <48f667c1-d25d-2983-72b5-336a6f800294@network-heretics.com> <CAChr6Sz3_zAyofqqML0XUrksa9HecEfHuxUdSnkmMxNeDfbC8A@mail.gmail.com> <25b91252-14a1-2267-06eb-293779df0be6@network-heretics.com> <CAChr6Sxtk1J9-AfaYivseK4kbj7Y+3+fKPzO7bx7SezX4-oV+w@mail.gmail.com> <7256eac5-d828-7f18-2337-230f299062f9@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <7256eac5-d828-7f18-2337-230f299062f9@joelhalpern.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:35:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sz+6eqYbZ_iSmu2gTZPhHD0gYR11zeAHfGSt703hdDS1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009f5f9705ad47a8d0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/q2koG800ZrMtlIm0H90TZFGMf2E>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-nottingham-discussion-recharter-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:36:09 -0000

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:33 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> This seems a very bad argument for removing the IETF list.
>

...

Removing lists has consequences / costs.
>

I believe the proposal does not remove the list. Did I misread?

I think it does change the role of the ietf@ list.

thanks,
Rob

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status