Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-04 expires next Thursday.
Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Sun, 21 February 2021 21:29 UTC
Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF203A11A3 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:29:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G3Sm0rUkoL2g for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EAEC3A11A2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF68D72F6B3; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:29:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sIMAq9_WQ9qe; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:29:31 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.27] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85AB4D72F69C; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:29:30 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:29:29 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5769)
Message-ID: <7009ED87-1A6C-4CF1-A432-9E4AB78D8938@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <CC04EBB0-9971-4398-9CAF-77C792FB56CF@pch.net>
References: <CC04EBB0-9971-4398-9CAF-77C792FB56CF@pch.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/v0uwxKVAHtcWlxZjXkT_YRKl8zA>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-04 expires next Thursday.
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 21:29:39 -0000
On 20 Feb 2021, at 20:17, Bill Woodcock wrote: > I note that the excellent draft-knodel-terminology-04 is currently set > to expire this upcoming Thursday. > > The draft has my full support, and I hope we can move forward with it, > whether individually or by merging with > draft-gondwana-effective-terminology, and/or > draft-moore-exclusionary-language. > > Where are we at on all that? Anything I can do to be helpful? Hi Bill, As per the summary of the two virtual interim meetings that took place post-IETF-108 (see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/6Od2aX-uiYGdYCKZqfvrOHHtY58), it was the rough consensus of GENDISPATCH that a "quick-spin" WG be formed to take on these issues and that draft-gondwana (rather than draft-knodel) would be a reasonable starting point for that WG's work. A draft charter started floating around last week, and we expect work to take place there if the WG is chartered. I'm sure the AD and the proponents of the WG would appreciate your comments on the proposed charter (see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/Zm8vtslsgMO-PbIEujvtZodVJBg). Until the official WG Review announcement goes out, it appears that this list is being used for discussion of the charter. In my opinion, if the WG gets chartered, it is almost certain that some of the ideas in draft-knodel will be merged into the WG's document(s). Cheers, pr -- Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ All connections to the world are tenuous at best
- [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-04 expires… Bill Woodcock
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-04 exp… Pete Resnick