Re: [Geojson] Drop all CRS? (Tracker issue #94)
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org> Tue, 12 January 2016 06:48 UTC
Return-Path: <dirkx@webweaving.org>
X-Original-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1C91A0031 for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:48:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id unl6WaAFVU0J for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:48:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from weser.webweaving.org (weser.webweaving.org [148.251.234.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D20D91A002D for <geojson@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:48:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.11.0.122] (a83-163-239-115.adsl.xs4all.nl [83.163.239.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by weser.webweaving.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u0C6jojf084743 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:45:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: weser.webweaving.org: Host a83-163-239-115.adsl.xs4all.nl [83.163.239.115] claimed to be [10.11.0.122]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOodmJrc9yvDZUAoQbx6ZdwjQS7KdOUg6tJ0rBHwzV7_JSkgaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:45:50 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <10C2E293-34F3-412F-9027-B39575C58B97@webweaving.org>
References: <CAOodmJrc9yvDZUAoQbx6ZdwjQS7KdOUg6tJ0rBHwzV7_JSkgaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (weser.webweaving.org [148.251.234.232]); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:45:51 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geojson/F1CCVZDi3rMtdbcNU5ttt2z6fc4>
Cc: geojson@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Geojson] Drop all CRS? (Tracker issue #94)
X-BeenThere: geojson@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF GeoJSON WG <geojson.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geojson/>
List-Post: <mailto:geojson@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 06:48:25 -0000
On 07 Jan 2016, at 23:55, Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@gmail.com> wrote: > In https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/issues/94, it is suggested that >> Relative to https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-butler-geojson-06.txt >> >> Section 6.3 and 6.3 >> >> As the original >> http://geojson.org/geojson-spec.html#coordinate-reference-system-objects >> is dropped from the internet draft - I am not sure why these sections >> cannot be simplified to simply stating that any and all coordinates are to >> be in EPSG:4326. >> >> Or alternatively - to introduce these - but do so wholesale and as a first >> class citizen (and allowing variant/attributed coordinates); with absence >> denoting EPSG:4326 >> > I would love to drop all CRS other than the default (CRS84, to be precise, > not EPSG:4326) and have proposed that we do so in the past, but I believe > that we don't have consensus for anything other than what's in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-geojson-00#section-3, a strong > recommendation against anything other than the default. Could you elaborate why you would want CRS84 rather than EPSG:4326 ? Thanks, Dw.
- [Geojson] Drop all CRS? (Tracker issue #94) Sean Gillies
- Re: [Geojson] Drop all CRS? (Tracker issue #94) Martin Thomson
- Re: [Geojson] Drop all CRS? (Tracker issue #94) Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: [Geojson] Drop all CRS? (Tracker issue #94) tõnis kärdi
- Re: [Geojson] Drop all CRS? (Tracker issue #94) Dirk-Willem van Gulik