Re: [Geojson] AD evaluation: drafti-ietf-geojson-02

You can remove my name.

> On Apr 14, 2016, at 1:36 PM, Allan Doyle <adoyle@intl-interfaces.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't see github commits as a valid metric. I find it to be too simplistic, not respectful of the effort put in since the inception, and an inaccurate measure of how much time any given individual has put in to the spec.
> 
> There was a discussion of this in 2014:
> https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/issues/54
> 
> 
>> On Apr 14, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Stefan Hagen <stefan@dilettant.eu> wrote:
>> On 12 April 2016 at 22:28:18 +02:00, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
>>> I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF last call. It is almost ready for last call, but I have a couple of questions I’d like to discuss below first before proceeding. I’ve also listed some nits that should be resolved together with any last call comments.
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> Nits:
>>> 
>>> = General =
>>> 
>>> (1) Typically RFCs in the IETF stream are limited to 5 authors. Would you consider collecting authorship under 1 or 2 editors? If not, do all 6 authors here expect to be active in responding to review comments and AUTH48 questions?
>> 
>> Chiming in alongside Tim:
>> I noticed in the past and also imagine for the future, that all
>> currently listed authoring members of the GeoJSON community
>> are willing to participate in reviewing comments and questions
>> that come out of this process.
>> 
>> If we had to reduce the number of authors, we could take from the current list of 6 the 5 with the most commits 
>> 
>> $ git shortlog -sne
>>    185  Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@gmail.com>
>>     35  Erik Wilde <dret@users.noreply.github.com>
>>     29  Sean Gillies <sean@mapbox.com>
>>     22  Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name>
>>     17  Tim Schaub <tim.schaub@gmail.com>
>>     11  Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>>      7  Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca>
>>      6  mpdaly <martin.daly@gmail.com>
>>      4  sgillies <sean.gillies@gmail.com>
>>      3  Tim Schaub <tschaub@users.noreply.github.com>
>>      3  S. Andrew Sheppard <andrew@wq.io>
>>      2  Simon J D Cox <dr.shorthair@gmail.com>
>>      2  Martin Daly <martin.daly@gmail.com>
>>      2  Matthew Perry <perrygeo@users.noreply.github.com>
>>      2  Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
>>      1  Blake Grotewold <hello@grotewold.me>
>>      1  Simon Cox <dr.shorthair@gmail.com>
>>      1  Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
>>      1  Stefan Drees <stefan.drees@parstream.com>
>> 
>> which would be Sean Gillies, Stefan Drees, Tim Schaub, Martin Daly. Does that seem fair? I'd make sure that all original authors and WG participants get acknowledged in the draft, of course.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sean Gillies
>> _______________________________________________
>> GeoJSON mailing list
>> GeoJSON@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geojson
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GeoJSON mailing list
> GeoJSON@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geojson