[Geojson] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7946 (7261)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 08 December 2022 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C36C152580 for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 06:38:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wVALFGW2J2PR for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 06:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A050C1527B7 for <geojson@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 06:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id EEA64B3AEF; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 06:37:55 -0800 (PST)
To: howard@hobu.co, martin.daly@cadcorp.com, adoyle@intl-interfaces.com, sean.gillies@gmail.com, stefan@hagen.link, tim.schaub@gmail.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, erik.wilde@dret.net, martin.thomson@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mark.hedley@metoffice.gov.uk, geojson@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221208143755.EEA64B3AEF@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 06:37:55 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geojson/x7g4K0d3ir5CNxEkMXqqfl2Z934>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 14:07:38 -0800
Subject: [Geojson] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7946 (7261)
X-BeenThere: geojson@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF GeoJSON WG <geojson.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geojson/>
List-Post: <mailto:geojson@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:38:01 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7946,
"The GeoJSON Format".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7261

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: mark hedley <mark.hedley@metoffice.gov.uk>

Section: 4

Original Text
-------------
An OPTIONAL third-position element SHALL be the height in meters above or below the 
WGS84 reference ellipsoid.

Corrected Text
--------------
An OPTIONAL third-position element SHALL be the height in meters above or below the 
EGM2008 geoid vertical datum, the height is defined with respect to the EGM2008 
vertical coordinate reference system (providing close approximation to altitude above 
global mean sea level).

Notes
-----
Vertical coordinates, where used within GeoJSON shall be interpreted as with respect to the EGM2008 vertical datum.  Transformations from WGS84 vertical coordinate values to EGM2008 coordinate values shall not be implemented (unless by prior arrangement between involved parties) .

There is specification information within the EPSG registry on both the EGM2008 vertical datum:
https://epsg.org/crs_3855/EGM2008-height.html
and on the compound of WGS84 latitude longitude with EGM2008 altitude
https://epsg.org/crs_9518/WGS-84-EGM2008-height.html

Common usage of altitude vertical coordinates is with respect to mean sea level. However, the original text within rfc7946 state that a vertical coordinate is with respect to the WGS84 reference ellipsoid.  

The WGS84 reference ellipsoid is an oblate spheroid that only partially approximates mean sea level. The EGM2008 (superseding EGM96) vertical  datum provides
"Zero-height surface resulting from the application of the EGM2008 geoid model to the WGS 84 ellipsoid." (https://epsg.org/crs_3855/EGM2008-height.htm)
EGM2008 closely models mean sea level as a global vertical datum.
 
Distortions are global position dependent, discrepancies can range from less than a metre to 10s of metres.  For example, at a location of  (50.218 -5.327 (WGS84)) the discrepancy between a WGS84 vertical coordinate and a EGM2008 vertical coordinate is 53.4 metres.
This is a really significant vertical discrepancy for a positional coordinate.

The update within this errata matches the specification to the widespread and common use of vertical position with respect to mean sea level, as measured by national mapping agencies and satellite earth observations.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7946 (draft-ietf-geojson-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The GeoJSON Format
Publication Date    : August 2016
Author(s)           : H. Butler, M. Daly, A. Doyle, S. Gillies, S. Hagen, T. Schaub
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Geographic JSON
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG