Re: [Geopriv] Draft IETF 79 Agenda

I also understand that there is a mailing list that can be used for  
these kind of discussions :)

On Oct 28, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Winterbottom, James wrote:

> I think 15 mins is enough to introduce the problem and how this  
> draft addresses it. We have virtual interim happen soon after to  
> discuss the pros and cons of this solution versus others.
>
> Cheers
> James
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org <geopriv-bounces@ietf.org>
> To: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>; geopriv@ietf.org <geopriv@ietf.org 
> >
> Sent: Thu Oct 28 18:48:34 2010
> Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Draft IETF 79 Agenda
>
> I wonder whether 15mins will be enough to discuss the topic. We had  
> a punch
> of mails on the subject recently.
>
>
> On 10/27/10 7:56 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <acooper@cdt.org> wrote:
>
>> 15m civic addressing extensions, draft-winterbottom-geopriv-local-
>> civic, draft-ietf-geopriv-prefix, etc. (R. Barnes)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv