Re: [Geopriv] WGLC: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-00

Looks good.

Minor comment that the editor might like to consider for the
schema...or not: enumerated types are more efficient than branching
regular expressions when it comes to defining simple types.  This
would apply to "layer3" and "target".  "layer4" would require a union
type with an enumerated type and a number (though the number could be
range constrained in that case).

I'll let Ray use his discretion - it's clear that the current schema
is correct.  A more efficient schema can be built by implementers

Nit in Section 3, p1: s/show/shown/

On 13 September 2012 07:52, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org> wrote:
> Dear GEOPRIV,
>
> This is a Working Group Last Call for comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-00:
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-00>
>
> Please send comments to the list no later than Friday, 5 October 2012.
>
> Remember that all comments are helpful, even if it's just "Looks good to me".  You can also say "Doesn't look good to me", but it's more helpful to say why!
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv