IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] Some comments on draft-thomson-geopriv-uncertainty-08

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 09 November 2013 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A688011E814B for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:31:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l80WbvjyPZ8l for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:31:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E91911E8160 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn9so295538wib.10 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:31:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1/+jT0JwC9uVmG2wShAombv6GzTpuxqvNeWA7TfUbPA=; b=i7J/NxD0yT5lpusl9KZcEigQmkg77GaRqFo8qtyEA5gH+H8V1aiqlx1PeCdm8iQGhk cW+Mj18iInhoerPpue1nlMMg/P+r/PIuHcoQqvW+G51GJ67ioaSiYj/xMhQHoBqfDlmt f7flGkWjwNCGn1de9ej2xcSw6sadKpQ7AEpY3m4nu9CKtY9C6XX5jsU25Un3hFK66xwR doERa2CXJQiy7+uueSOy9URBywmMMAjUDL+hrTfbqEcbToSZXK6ISszOWrklPI31miPR OZr7alFwVz2TCD3u32o7EIgw5xJym1YSRWb60xMmglPFZfbBRXO0AHPj1lDKxqDPkNL0 xr8Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.37.164 with SMTP id z4mr4972591wij.30.1383975094377; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.101.73 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:31:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p06240602cea30ef88944@dhcp-9302.meeting.ietf.org>
References: <CAOPrzE3Phx0anv9J3zrrBozsf4p0TJk+KZYWZz_hA_=9FyZnOA@mail.gmail.com> <B700712C-1899-494C-9E28-02BC62AE81C3@gmail.com> <9549C6C2-3B3E-4153-A46F-EB930B310115@brianrosen.net> <A16D1601-7DB8-4BD3-901E-B7C8364DF358@gmail.com> <89D45E92-85AB-457D-9A1B-67C163BC2558@brianrosen.net> <CABkgnnXUaQoEGdueAOMMYrk46LKiQf05osKERVbsuhorr002fw@mail.gmail.com> <2E75B9D1-C082-4DA1-9DB5-F20AD804F220@brianrosen.net> <CABkgnnWPJrkL10ArUZ5OM+GfEvoqK91KmjO6M3r7BuvFt_XdwA@mail.gmail.com> <p06240602cea30ef88944@dhcp-9302.meeting.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:31:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV0B58_GKRJq5rjK3eE_5p5N_1t6YwY1ZpR+8Z5KWSYwg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Some comments on draft-thomson-geopriv-uncertainty-08
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 05:31:45 -0000

On 8 November 2013 13:58, Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Which is how it was originally.

Yes, but it was very difficult to consume such a document, which is
why we ended up with RFC 5491.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email