Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Fri, 05 June 2009 11:14 UTC
Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333DA3A69E2 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.526, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aZP1m-x40rcl for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C2323A6873 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Jun 2009 11:14:39 -0000
Received: from a91-154-108-144.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO 4FIL42860) [91.154.108.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp068) with SMTP; 05 Jun 2009 13:14:39 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/BobQ9ypfBxQJAjsscX7M7pS6NMOZVhVZsYX2dEj hzeMYHeDzhsI/z
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: "'DRAGE, Keith (Keith)'" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "'James M. Polk'" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, 'Bernard Aboba' <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, geopriv@ietf.org
References: <4A25CC1C.6070100@bbn.com><BLU137-W2318AA46D9DD9730E99EA993480@phx.gbl><002101c9e5b2$e273f780$0301a8c0@nsnintra.net><XFE-SJC-212LFQG101s0000c68e@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com> <01b201c9e5bc$9ffead50$0301a8c0@nsnintra.net> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE206E9CAB6@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:16:31 +0300
Message-ID: <01c201c9e5cf$14a1aa60$0301a8c0@nsnintra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE206E9CAB6@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: AcnluuvUQk4a+TwJRgCM4oJQoEA9ugAAWTZgAANQpIAAAUsc4A==
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.51
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:14:40 -0000
It is the responsibility of the working group chairs to select the authors of a document. >-----Original Message----- >From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@alcatel-lucent.com] >Sent: 05 June, 2009 13:38 >To: Hannes Tschofenig; 'James M. Polk'; 'Bernard Aboba'; >geopriv@ietf.org >Subject: RE: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review > >You get the next version by proposing precise text against the >listed open issues, or by opening another issue. > >Keith > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig >> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:04 AM >> To: 'James M. Polk'; 'Bernard Aboba'; geopriv@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review >> >> I am looking forward to the next version. >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk@cisco.com] >> >Sent: 05 June, 2009 11:52 >> >To: Hannes Tschofenig; 'Bernard Aboba'; geopriv@ietf.org >> >Subject: Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review >> > >> >Hannes >> > >> >Please re-read what Richard said about this -- (paraphrasing) >> > >> > "the -00 version of this doc will be the text from RFC 3825 >> > *with* the new boilerplate, and that's all." >> > >> >-01 and beyond will have changed text, based on WG >consensus of what >> >needs to be changed (i.e., Alissa's 6 items, at least). >> > >> >James >> > >> >At 02:54 AM 6/5/2009, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> >>Hi Bernard, >> >> >> >>the only a few comments at this point in time. >> >> >> >>I cannot find the person(s) that have brought up the issue, >> tried to >> >>convince the working group that there is a problem for >> years and have >> >>submitted documents to explain the issue anywhere in the document >> >>(neither as author(s), contributor(s) nor anything else). >> >> >> >>That cannot be right. >> >> >> >>I don't see the guys who implemented this specification (based on >> >>Martin's >> >>clarifications) listed in the document either. We should >> acknowledge >> >>their work a bit more ("Remember: Rough consensus and >> RUNNING CODE") >> >>given that they are the poor folks who had to decipher our >> mysterious >> >>specifications and very likely spent a lot of time doing so. >> >> >> >>Ciao >> >>Hannes >> >> >> >>________________________________ >> >> >> >> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org >> >>[mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba >> >> Sent: 05 June, 2009 08:06 >> >> To: geopriv@ietf.org >> >> Subject: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review >> >> >> >> >> >> Starting from the text of RFC 3825, I have produced >> >a strawman >> >>-00 draft of RFC 3825bis: >> >> >> >>http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/GEOPRIV/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc38 >> >25bis-00. >> >>txt >> >> >> >> Comments welcome. >> >> >> >> Other than the editorial changes outlined in >> Appendix B, the >> >>basis of the -00 strawman is RFC 3825, so that no technical >> >differences should >> >>have been introduced. Just to make sure, I have compared >> >the text to RFC >> >>3825 line by line. >> >> >> >> The -00 strawman generates no errors or warings >> >when reviewed >> >>by the ID-NITS tool (see below). >> >> >> >> On checking the URLs provided in the Reference >> section, two >> >>questions arose: >> >> >> >> a. EPSG. One of the URLs given for the EPSG now >> resolves to >> >>the IHS site map: >> >> >> >> http://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html >> >> >> >> Does this URL need to be updated, removed or left as is? >> >> >> >> b. WGS 84. There is no longer a web site >> configured at the >> >>cited >> >>URL: >> >> http://www.wgs84.com/ >> >> >> >> Is there an updated URL available? >> >> >> >> =========================================== >> >> ID-NITS output >> >> >> >> idnits 2.11.11 >> >> >> >> tmp/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt: >> >> >> >> Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the >> >IETF Trust (see >> >> http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): >> >> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >> >--------- >> >>----- >> >> >> >> No issues found here. >> >> >> >> Checking nits according to >> >>http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: >> >> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >> >--------- >> >>----- >> >> >> >> No issues found here. >> >> >> >> Checking nits according to >> >http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: >> >> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >> >--------- >> >>----- >> >> >> >> No issues found here. >> >> >> >> Miscellaneous warnings: >> >> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >> >--------- >> >>----- >> >> >> >> -- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 >> work, but >> >>was first >> >> submitted on or after 10 November 2008. Does >> it really >> >>need the >> >> disclaimer? >> >> >> >> >> >> Checking references for intended status: >> Proposed Standard >> >> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >> >--------- >> >>----- >> >> >> >> (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using >> >>normative references >> >> to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) >> >> >> >> -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative >> >reference: ref. 'EPSG' >> >> >> >> -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative >> >reference: ref. 'WGS84' >> >> >> >> >> >> Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 warnings (==), 3 >> >comments (--). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >> >>Geopriv mailing list >> >>Geopriv@ietf.org >> >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geopriv mailing list >> Geopriv@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv >> >
- [Geopriv] Plan for 3825bis Richard Barnes
- [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… Carl Reed
- Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Rev… Carl Reed