[Geopriv] having too much confidence
Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu> Fri, 08 November 2013 02:18 UTC
Return-Path: <npdoty@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E9721E814C for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:18:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9pxIt52IVxpI for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A0121E8119 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id mx11so534792bkb.17 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:18:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version; bh=0TC4CR4Q2UqT7/YWl5oQG4um2fiuV/qw3UzchwuiRPI=; b=SJq48mVqoKB7FAfQ/0cMyPLRQsB3+LSduTG55Oig/2R6TY+VG0q23LlGougN5HLmkk Yl/kY8xeoNSuJTD1cI3uH9g1CovwESpM4WCRiExGDIKATAqYKP3Hy2In+m2tKu3En9ac Z5dH6IArCE1bBRnSlYY1u4ZTIMiqz3gvwcxOX18Eu69bMpUSXMgzqmv5NPaNluJMAEOI eJD/O9wE3B6DHUAMvrl/Ad3UNfp2D3ar09uGRKsVIHaCnSzSY4wGESSUEzHZ23Pxn5dc Fto+U/QrW76Hg7JszOlg0tGHb7YA2X8KjHIVNBFOl/snE124WNnfnky189D7k2UbwlAH N+eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmGyjv1XkMLYb6xU/OPs7fCldjayYaSNGn6bk80fq0FWw1raM/ct5LpO4hbZppYeejx1rut
X-Received: by 10.205.106.6 with SMTP id ds6mr5039832bkc.23.1383877128588; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:160:8e9:d9dd:8759:1fee? ([2001:67c:370:160:8e9:d9dd:8759:1fee]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id no2sm4130442bkb.15.2013.11.07.18.18.46 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:18:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2853E6B0-AB4D-4DF5-AD35-EE885313E300"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:18:43 -0800
Message-Id: <74E6BDB9-E3F4-44F8-963B-76A415396620@ischool.berkeley.edu>
To: martin.thomson@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: [Geopriv] having too much confidence
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:18:55 -0000
Re: draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-04 > Confidence MUST NOT be included unless location information cannot be > acquired with 95% confidence. What's the value of this requirement? Does it hurt to have 99% confidence and say so with the extra XML element? —Nick
- [Geopriv] having too much confidence Nick Doty