[Geopriv] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5774 (2066)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 05 March 2010 10:35 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7010A3A8F4B for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 02:35:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2fxACxXG+WSl for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 02:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51A03A8746 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 02:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 83900E0707; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 02:35:09 -0800 (PST)
To: karlheinz.wolf@nic.at, alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at, rjsparks@nostrum.com, fluffy@cisco.com, rbarnes@bbn.com, acooper@cdt.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100305103509.83900E0707@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:35:09 -0800
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, ah@TR-Sys.de, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Geopriv] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5774 (2066)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:35:07 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5774, "Considerations for Civic Addresses in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO): Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5774&eid=2066 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 1, 6th para Original Text ------------- Section 3.4 of [RFC4776] also contains instructions on the creation | of civic address considerations documents on page 8. This document updates that section and replaces said instructions with Sections 4 and 5 of this memo. Corrected Text -------------- Section 3.4 of [RFC4776] also contains instructions on the creation | of civic address considerations documents on page 9. This document updates that section and replaces said instructions with Sections 4 and 5 of this memo. Notes ----- Rationale: This indeed refers to the second paragraph on page _9_ of RFC 4776. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5774 (draft-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-03) -------------------------------------- Title : Considerations for Civic Addresses in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO): Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition Publication Date : March 2010 Author(s) : K. Wolf, A. Mayrhofer Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Geographic Location/Privacy Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Geopriv] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5774 (20… RFC Errata System