IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] WG2LC: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-00.txt

Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com> Wed, 16 September 2009 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mlinsner@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC4528C0E8 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.495, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rLQi4VDuShlY for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF203A6BA2 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAI7DsEpAZnmf/2dsb2JhbADGZYhMAZBYBYItgWo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,399,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="58431136"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2009 17:57:36 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8GHvaEQ026100; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:57:36 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8GHvaZZ026695; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:57:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:57:36 -0400
Received: from [10.116.195.120] ([10.116.195.120]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:57:36 -0400
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:57:34 -0400
From: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
To: "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>, GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C6D69F4E.1B579%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Geopriv] WG2LC: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-00.txt
Thread-Index: Aco2JGG95022+SbEd0qQ/W186Tur3QAHo2DLAC0O8RI=
In-Reply-To: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF1062C3A76@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2009 17:57:36.0350 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C6ACFE0:01CA36F7]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=959; t=1253123856; x=1253987856; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mlinsner@cisco.com; z=From:=20Marc=20Linsner=20<mlinsner@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Geopriv]=20WG2LC=3A=0A=20draft-ietf-ge opriv-held-identity-extensions-00.txt |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Winterbottom,=20James=22=20<James.Winterbottom@an drew.com>,=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20GEOPRIV=20<geopriv@ietf .org>; bh=n7jYEfp1BmLoQBlY2SBpERs1PqGd3k9jYAIvhxQu5n8=; b=RbgmMHUKjWoFAF5gD61XHAUT6anOFKoKAWMdwnET5WKLc8xdMzfpwknykB kAD/7hSIExkW1UmadEZ4T9N7O9c0n4hc2smppX7aMd10kuRynNY0Alm7XLv3 2gIK6VpQY3;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=mlinsner@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG2LC: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-00.txt
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:56:48 -0000

James,

In-line.....


On 9/15/09 4:41 PM, "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
wrote:

> Hi Marc,
> 
> 
> 
> A few things. Firstly the HUM was adoption or rejection, your post was
> non-committal, it wasn't a call for comments, it was a HUM.

Correct, there never was a call for comments on version 10 of the draft.
Normal IETF procedure is for a new version of an individual draft to be
announced to the WG mail list to solicit comments prior to any HUM asking if
it's ready to be elevated to a WG document.  Since version 10 of the
individual draft was never announced to the GeoPriv list, my comments were
appropriate and coincide with my comments for several of the previous
versions.


> 
> 
> 
> Martin posted an explicit email about your comments yesterday.

Interesting, email must be in some strange time-warp problem.  Martin's
email showed up 5 hours after yours.

-Marc-

snip.................

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status