IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] Code collision in relative-location

James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59F311E823D for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yw3zcfdnTQKz for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22e.google.com (mail-ve0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6BD21F8447 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id oz10so10438256veb.33 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vDdaTSqIysBl3M6wrVPg+5Nwh69j8IFUB+qAdMy04lA=; b=Jhx9nw/O4ln5AmCAFIq9ftICotPfyqm4kmupbt0sf7Rl4uhBaFJJgoSQ3TlDFhMfj9 SJkNwUHbTFNaf9Qyb5q98FfzP89LaGwQ+XUI4iDaABt3Jt0pb3Eh8nYkg5T2Ur/kLZ1O dqm3mI1HUwzktlvYuJlZ6CnWnuggMDstqywH4cvnEYzv2RWIDLr3tWakppSp4bLEioC9 nfdhcp0qp+nHaMK0McI1rjGmJ2vvNUPK3rL+8G8/tT302uVCSUpRZ55Lh5nCipULQlRd 3+17HtHHUyzyk9Q1GCihhoLuFX03hke2DzynFmFA27XGoohPF1zCGlkCz6M52qoUnIBR GtpA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.65.111 with SMTP id w15mr23680561vds.73.1373925713481; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.182.70 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <513FA27C-A2AD-4A51-B67D-59748F1A483A@gmx.net>
References: <CABkgnnWDE-2q0nywmwQ19+sJ+KOmgsYNCOtqGRPhug+C_UNBZA@mail.gmail.com> <513FA27C-A2AD-4A51-B67D-59748F1A483A@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:01:53 +1000
Message-ID: <CAMqK8yJ=0x1-5W8kybExUqBdHUk4dXqQTV4qoYL9=_PQ_B7KNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307f3b4419951104e19402dc"
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Code collision in relative-location
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:02:14 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:02:14 -0000

I think that the problem is more serious than this.
RFC6848 for all intents and purposed closed the CATypes registry to
registration of new types "except by IESG Approval [RFC5226] under unusual
circumstances".

If we want to register these as new types then we probably need state why
this is an "unusual circumstance".

Cheers
James



On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Make the change.
>
> On Jul 15, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
> > Barry notes that we have a collision in the codes that we assigned for
> > draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location.
> >
> > RFC 4776 defines 128 as Script.  relative-location tries to use that
> > for relative location map coordinates.
> >
> > Since I've been tardy enough that the deadline is imminent, I'm going
> > to renumber to avoid this problem.  To keep things clean, I'm going to
> > bump all the codes from 128 up by one.
> >
> > OLD:
> >   | 128    | relative location map coordinates      | this RFC  |
> >   | 129    | relative location map angle            | this RFC  |
> >   | 130    | relative location map scale            | this RFC  |
> > NEW:
> >   | 129    | relative location map coordinates      | this RFC  |
> >   | 130    | relative location map angle            | this RFC  |
> >   | 131    | relative location map scale            | this RFC  |
> >
> > If this is a problem, please object.  If you are quick, we might be
> > able to catch the deadline.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geopriv mailing list
> > Geopriv@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJR5GjfAAoJEGhJURNOOiAtAEsH/154fZS9jDeMX1mOnobIHb0n
> pJacNWduAIoHDk6cgkR/XRYPrs4EEd+w60TUw7cMaP4M0aoKpIrn+rhxrnXyCWpH
> 0aG9eSFAElOu653tTVGaRBlcnSv8j7RHc1rMLRXjLYajo3AhMPb6JWuyu6qjQ7ZD
> x8imeqiis6HrxMXNg7QjIM6dpdiXvRATxRQg55HNr9zgVpf6khjUep6E8FoTFikq
> EDvUPziNlUGTP+3IQ/IWekUx7caRHS9pjL4bSiFkMAQGeH8EWvTNGE72fTPuhbTG
> IPov7Yuak5dS6Fgl4XftPnvvj3tOUTmC/S/ogH0AnHqRXMC6cl4OcgeJJSzgwWE=
> =YrbZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email