Re: [Geopriv] [GEOPRIV] Liberty Alliance
"Alberto Ballauri" <tesi.ballauri.sacco@gmail.com> Wed, 23 April 2008 09:24 UTC
Return-Path: <geopriv-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: geopriv-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-geopriv-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1EF3A6A27; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909903A699F for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.744, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uBgts4pNjC4v for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785A528C1A1 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so21808ywb.49 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=qKBA6amZJ8lyPTPbWhmceSYUlbMBJ5b7dyk+eqEsjNQ=; b=CYKoU0KSVXEeK0G5xIS/Cpd547Zc9RG84UJRTnIukv2Og+Q6Er7kmPHrnVbe/txAme2WhaEhdiMcg0Oeit2dcIoaS3oqT525M4CvaKQYpMdc0gNfwAH5AF6zByL/5Vjuzppkd7qY7G5ynTm59x33Rn+mT/7wBs+MiI8mn0I/o+E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=LIoL7GD3gUGNu9eygUMo8rBvgadI8qv9C1WcJqgGPOCrHQEVH4N/Jkc6nPQKpyTxNu2017j1gx2QxR32IZH3zvvSVvZpeuyix+q7OZs6HAXE9I5L+Vrc+DQDvPBTRyksbgf3OPdI8pOPtM661ZsNKTYCr/pdw77ffock1aTPuiA=
Received: by 10.151.109.11 with SMTP id l11mr184710ybm.171.1208942234542; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.140.12 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fe9f45350804230217u68f97c8ak529c11abcfe19a8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:17:14 +0200
From: Alberto Ballauri <tesi.ballauri.sacco@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <480DD879.3080107@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <fe9f45350804220315m520dead4jef55ab12cbd57289@mail.gmail.com> <480DD879.3080107@gmx.net>
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] [GEOPRIV] Liberty Alliance
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0487745005=="
Sender: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, the scenario is an LbyR architecture, we have a Presence Network Agent (PNA) that retrive location information from a Lis using Held and then publish the information to the Presence Server (PS) with Geopriv capabilities. The rules that must be respected are double: - those configured at the Lis by the Target that apply to the Held Client in the PNA - those configured at the PS by the presentity owner that regards the watchers So in this Target-Requestor-...-Requestor chain scenario how can we be sure that the first Requestor could respect all the rules of the chain and doesn't misuse the information? The Liberty Alliance framework of trust could respond to such a question, so we would like to know if is foreseen to support it in Held. Ciao Alberto & Tommaso 2008/4/22, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>: > > Hi Alberto, > > could you provide us a bit more details on what you try to accomplish? > > Ciao > Hannes > > Alberto Ballauri wrote: > > > Hi all, > > We would like to know if for Held has been forseen a "Circle of Trust" > > of the type Liberty Alliance, and the possibility of a cascade > > authentication system, and the possibility of the authentication using that > > system for the application of the rules. > > > > Regards > > > > Alberto & Tommaso > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Geopriv mailing list > > Geopriv@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Geopriv mailing list Geopriv@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
- [Geopriv] [GEOPRIV] Liberty Alliance Alberto Ballauri
- Re: [Geopriv] [GEOPRIV] Liberty Alliance Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] [GEOPRIV] Liberty Alliance Alberto Ballauri
- Re: [Geopriv] [GEOPRIV] Liberty Alliance Hannes Tschofenig