IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] Geopriv Digest, Vol 110, Issue 12

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 01 August 2013 05:02 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B215021F9C34 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fk+dk+mtjBi1 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B641421F9C32 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f14so1389123wiw.1 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VyTahcrNPM5JXoXhfZs9Qm0TQFrtwFpCy49J4jsf9Ak=; b=iwZOTDBHhvtfT996uGNC5xNqpHf2RyMjMu+b2CZ0p6kDbfo7r5Tle3mSq14P8DJJED L0UX6t2UU+SxRwb8IKk9k2MUiNgudSguuY/+8Jf0qJ7Kc5vUle77nwAwOrokGguPkIjr dcQreLALRiEbhNuCKxOjbo8qye4+fx5sKi0uzgCKBVD3TpmC1lWljckgunXF+i1Es/NW Q1ywBSwb5Mi0srTQ+dt6sA16C7bH7YeMeIUnP5HuSTpV0rNyIJfVCZifRgN9Sq/zesGX VlEdGQ8WSWAXqeAqCGjAmqcIh/LkktlhoLSCr/IllwFrl2Z2+DKd9Sn0zfUmnMMREcbI 3Jtw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.92.1 with SMTP id ci1mr6468549wib.14.1375333371907; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <50682.87.77.163.143.1375302238.webmail@webmail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
References: <mailman.1.1375297201.15354.geopriv@ietf.org> <50682.87.77.163.143.1375302238.webmail@webmail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:02:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWOvWnki=cKuVkamG0Nk1U+ACjXgrzJNGZ9SVUrKDMktQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Yuan Yang <yangyuancs@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Geopriv Digest, Vol 110, Issue 12
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 05:02:53 -0000

On 31 July 2013 22:23, Yuan Yang <yangyuancs@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>     There is a hot talk about uncertainty of positon information or
> position estimations. Besides, the position-related measurements also
> contain much uncertainness, which has not been associated.
>
>     We may need clarify the position uncertainty and the measurement
> uncertainty. Is that useful to add a definition and an effect of
> measurement uncertainty in draft-jones-geopriv-sigpos-survey-02?


Hi Yuan,

I'd encourage you to read
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv-uncertainty-07.

I think that this includes the definitions that you are talking about.

--Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email