Re: [Geopriv] I-D Action: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-09.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 06 September 2013 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D396E21F9E8B for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zio7dSoqWFqE for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2083221F860A for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b12so791602wgh.1 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eh8CMIAP4tsbiK8a1jqM00mTjz1GaC9mZkJnjXhRDZc=; b=q2i2syoG4YtDDz3sELj6paVWe/qYHyBy+1/zVjFh6cX9ClaJlW50+XMzzjzMJmjCfe bey5+eJ/EVmYR5ajMmRXmVWEL+5WMHGUKyKO2l4oPQSRamQoQX9hQyY+yLq01UmKaO9P DHNQlDfGsTG04R/oQ5v9Qrzyw1oHIKLq4W6IXao/Hic20GLBqC1x7CUvS6OGUxKnw4IC F/7Id6iJf2fTIxwQg68ILK/VcgmtKLcmqcWOrLJR6Vrsbbh9vCpytNI7VrNvAUhe168H vyeu9temuPZCUoMcnH9mBS8oxgd9uZc/iwhs2libpEMZV66Bzof40ebFlPZOOexWyJjd iy5w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.109.10 with SMTP id ho10mr11396685wib.14.1378490309171; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.28.39 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130906165745.19402.59929.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20130906165745.19402.59929.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:58:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWhYZYpZMfK5Zw_YLSH_zD1uKU1q+mJ0gU+vO5NfXVswQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] I-D Action: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-09.txt
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:59:02 -0000

In the confusion around IESG evaluation, I forgot to follow up with a
change.  As you can see from the diff, the changes are miniscule.

On 6 September 2013 09:57,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Geographic Location/Privacy Working Group of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Using Device-provided Location-Related Measurements in Location Configuration Protocols
>         Author(s)       : Martin Thomson
>                           James Winterbottom
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-09.txt