Re: [Geopriv] Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07.txt> (Location Information Server (LIS) Discovery using IP address and Reverse DNS) to Proposed Standard
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 05 December 2013 22:39 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E47F1AE222 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJHK3oMYORU2 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA911AE204 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wo20so18163348obc.25 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:39:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=E2TBomntwQHBon5HC8pGUI+Q1HsUy3IcuhfRQ+aj0M8=; b=BoapxVY6KwRnQ171qOlt9Q4GDt/UlPKBNp9NJBl5enE/yoODNkENB7xeWCrB34t0oD /mQYAt9SB+IrXxh7DX1b0+XMhgb9RHcLw0p+sqK2yz7jswWYGkwaKOj296fImT717esA N9vb4n10ZrGJ7/bqYJ5IqbW9ErKAtRtbT/hwynvIWjKA2OBbp36rWvrQ4zSHkQ6KBE4J qoVilh9crIz0hd+WXymdYMT0u1sSLXae1iTpwjfllT3/3Hqp/nJ8Kj9vfoI/L2wK69Rq w3YVZ0V02dgFqYTzUpi9+vmOELo7JKJI4ArD4XEhQRIzuQTgdFPIIg7K2fPsJzge5mOt qFMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9jWvei/8ysdnghfaBTJbYWPOWccTHHCG5A1RDHv1fnkzWYThFzym6M5PjAMv97tvKF9lz
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.65.227 with SMTP id a3mr84344oet.13.1386283182333; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.31.74 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:39:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131205192900.6703.65271.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20131205192900.6703.65271.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:39:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQ04LiF4M-zQxhU-eG+uMY_irp5y+zP4O6ZeQQ+zM-=rA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c25700a4366704ecd13433"
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07.txt> (Location Information Server (LIS) Discovery using IP address and Reverse DNS) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:39:50 -0000
Hi all, Some of you may notice that a couple of unusual things about this LC: 1. It is the third LC for this document. 2. It is only a week long. The second LC was because the IESG decided to change the state of the proposed RFC from Informational to Proposed Standard. Unfortunately, while the document was updated, the datatracker was not, so the email for the second LC said "Information" even though the document said "Proposed Standard". So we are running an abbreviated third LC with the correct status indicated in both places to ensure that everyone has sufficient notice. Thanks, --Richard On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:29 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Geographic Location/Privacy WG > (geopriv) to consider the following document: > - 'Location Information Server (LIS) Discovery using IP address and > Reverse DNS' > <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-12-12. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > The residential gateway is a device that has become an integral part > of home networking equipment. Discovering a Location Information > Server (LIS) is a necessary part of acquiring location information > for location-based services. However, discovering a LIS when a > residential gateway is present poses a configuration challenge, > requiring a method that is able to work around the obstacle presented > by the gateway. > > This document describes a solution to this problem. The solution > provides alternative domain names as input to the LIS discovery > process based on the network addresses assigned to a Device. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > _______________________________________________ > Geopriv mailing list > Geopriv@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv >
- [Geopriv] Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-l… The IESG
- Re: [Geopriv] Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-… Richard Barnes