[Geopriv] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5491 (1749)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 30 March 2009 11:07 UTC

Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5523A67FA for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.377, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id om1olTnSgJWp for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFD13A67D0 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2UB7ETO001526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n2UB7Cqs001515; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:07:12 -0700
Message-Id: <200903301107.n2UB7Cqs001515@boreas.isi.edu>
To: james.winterbottom@andrew.com, martin.thomson@andrew.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, rjsparks@nostrum.com, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, fluffy@cisco.com, rbarnes@bbn.com, acooper@cdt.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:59:26 -0700
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, ah@TR-Sys.de, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Geopriv] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5491 (1749)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:07:44 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5491,
"GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5491&eid=1749

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>

Section: 5.2.5,pg.20

Original Text
-------------
     <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
               xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"
               xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
               xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"
               entity="pres:paul@somecell.example.com">
       <tuple id="arcband">
         <status>
           <gp:geopriv>
             <gp:location-info>
               <gs:ArcBand srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326">
                 <gml:pos>-43.5723 153.21760</gml:pos>
                 <gs:innerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   3594
                 </gs:innerRadius>
                 <gs:outerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   4148
                 </gs:outerRadius>
                 <gs:startAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
                   20
                 </gs:startAngle>
                 <gs:openingAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
|                  20
                 </gs:openingAngle>
               </gs:ArcBand>
             </gp:location-info>
             <gp:usage-rules/>
             <gp:method>TA-NMR</gp:method>
           </gp:geopriv>
         </status>
         <timestamp>2007-06-22T20:57:29Z</timestamp>
       </tuple>
     </presence>

                 Figure 12: PIDF-LO Containing an Arc Band

   An important note to make on the arc band is that the center point
|  used in the definition of the shape is not included in resulting
   enclosed area, and that Target may be anywhere in the defined area of
   the arc band.


Corrected Text
--------------
     <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
               xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"
               xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
               xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"
               entity="pres:paul@somecell.example.com">
       <tuple id="arcband">
         <status>
           <gp:geopriv>
             <gp:location-info>
               <gs:ArcBand srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326">
                 <gml:pos>-43.5723 153.21760</gml:pos>
                 <gs:innerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   3594
                 </gs:innerRadius>
                 <gs:outerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   4148
                 </gs:outerRadius>
                 <gs:startAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
                   20
                 </gs:startAngle>
                 <gs:openingAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
|                  120
                 </gs:openingAngle>
               </gs:ArcBand>
             </gp:location-info>
             <gp:usage-rules/>
             <gp:method>TA-NMR</gp:method>
           </gp:geopriv>
         </status>
         <timestamp>2007-06-22T20:57:29Z</timestamp>
       </tuple>
     </presence>

                 Figure 12: PIDF-LO Containing an Arc Band

   An important note to make on the arc band is that the center point
|  used in the definition of the shape is not included in the resulting
   enclosed area, and that Target may be anywhere in the defined area of
   the arc band.


Notes
-----
a)  The openingAngle in Figure 12 does not match the scenario
    depicted in Figure 11 and described in the text on page 19.
    ==>  s/20/120/

b)  Missing article.

Hint (saving an additional Errata Note):
  In Section 5.2.8 (2nd line on pg.24), another article is missing:
  s/floors of building/floors of a building/

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5491 (draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile-14)
--------------------------------------
Title               : GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations
Publication Date    : March 2009
Author(s)           : J. Winterbottom, M. Thomson, H. Tschofenig
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Geographic Location/Privacy
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG