[Geopriv] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5491 (1951)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 01 December 2009 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF963A67F5 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Zl+QVtTi1QA for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:20:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E763A6828 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB15Hl8q004953; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id nB15Hju9004937; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:17:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:17:45 -0800
Message-Id: <200912010517.nB15Hju9004937@boreas.isi.edu>
To: james.winterbottom@andrew.com, martin.thomson@andrew.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, rjsparks@nostrum.com, fluffy@cisco.com, rbarnes@bbn.com, acooper@cdt.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:42:44 -0800
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Geopriv] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5491 (1951)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:20:50 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5491,
"GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5491&eid=1951

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@andrew.com>

Section: 5.2.2

Original Text
-------------
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--F-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--E-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.122</gml:pos> <!--D-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--C-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--B-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->

Corrected Text
--------------
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--B-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--C-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.122</gml:pos> <!--D-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--E-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--F-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->

Notes
-----
The points in Figure 7 are correct (i.e., they are in a counter-clockwise direction) but the comment labels are in the wrong order.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5491 (draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile-14)
--------------------------------------
Title               : GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations
Publication Date    : March 2009
Author(s)           : J. Winterbottom, M. Thomson, H. Tschofenig
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Geographic Location/Privacy
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG