[Geopriv] [Errata Verified] RFC4119 (7528)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 25 March 2024 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC8CC151991; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35AK41PmzJcD; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82997C14F6BA; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 7001A11FD91; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: shrsoni@gmail.com, jon.peterson@neustar.biz
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: orie@transmute.industries, iesg@ietf.org, geopriv@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240325174820.7001A11FD91@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:48:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/uVmG1ZjjgtUZkf7hwWn8CZSUDSk>
Subject: [Geopriv] [Errata Verified] RFC4119 (7528)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:48:24 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC4119,
"A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7528

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Shraddha Soni <shrsoni@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2023-05-29
Verified by: Orie Steele (IESG)

Section: Normative References

Original Text
-------------
[15]  OpenGIS, "Open Geography Markup Language (GML) Implementation
         Specification", OGC 02-023r4, January 2003,
         <http://www.opengeospatial.org/specs/?page=specs>.

Corrected Text
--------------
[15]  OpenGIS, "Open Geography Markup Language (GML) Implementation
         Specification", OGC 02-023r4, January 2003,
         <https://www.ogc.org/standard/gml/>.



         

Notes
-----
On clicking the link, now we get "Page not found" Error. It is best to avoid links to external website which is not maintained by rfc-editor.

--------------------------------------
RFC4119 (draft-ietf-geopriv-pidf-lo-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format
Publication Date    : December 2005
Author(s)           : J. Peterson
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Geographic Location/Privacy
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG