[Geopriv] Re: DHCP Civil Editorial Comments

Thanks for catching these items. I suspect they can be addressed  
during AUTH48, whenever that will occur.

On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:34 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:

> Ok, so I know that this document is well past the time where  
> comments are usually accepted.  I don't expect changes to be made,  
> but here are a few things that I noticed in updating the revised  
> civic draft:
>
> * The description for Building is under a second section entitled  
> 'LMK' - the second section with this title.
>
> * The description for a post office box is hidden under the 'PCN'  
> description.  It deserves its own description:
>   The "post office box" element (POBOX) describes a container, such
>   as a pigeon hole, at a central mailing location, where mail is held.
>
> * The table on page 12 indicates that there is a "SEAT" type in PIDF 
> (-LO) - this is not true.
>
> I apologise for not raising these earlier, but sometimes you have  
> to look from a particular perspective to notice these things.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --------------------------
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> this email is prohibited.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --------------------------
> [mf2]

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv