[GGIE] Draft charter Re: Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104

"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Tue, 23 April 2019 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27D5120616 for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HSfkMQTKmqDq for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from insect.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (insect.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 826131203A4 for <ggie@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FFD12614E; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:03:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.20.60]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A20441260A6; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:02:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.2); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:03:03 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Attack-Chief: 1d9f6c315a878ab1_1556056975874_2811117367
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1556056975874:1683178904
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1556056975873
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D329380846; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=gecEGeJWu7ChMGVm1Ef5/oj2Y4Y =; b=svZXViKsnGLpu5GWKpgzJQw/cV8v+xoNm7iBU+QySkp/soMWxwnaxva4Ai6 fV6j9KbhjT7NqFdOgfhDo7YNK2LiUXE8g0pwG3otFftMgjostOSpTUp8B5xmXh9i +YHkLTqxoTmryvWCYuiIdqGhmZ8ziPQprPiVkkQHNECQPGJQ=
Received: from [192.168.1.57] (vtelinet-216-66-102-83.vermontel.net [216.66.102.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ldaigle@thinkingcat.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F9DA8083E; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a55
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
Cc: ggie@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:02:42 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <DB16BC1F-EA23-4936-A565-CDA1DCB42743@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <89FC28E2-1F4D-4BAB-A04E-18266F56A547@akamai.com>
References: <E03C970A-A8A8-4272-B9C7-8040F6AFF293@thinkingcat.com> <89FC28E2-1F4D-4BAB-A04E-18266F56A547@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_10CA03F6-1409-4DFD-9B4D-E9D4966385CC_="
Embedded-HTML: [{"HTML":[2394, 5545], "plain":[1898, 1909], "uuid":"0C83B454-8869-4822-A756-38D8CA438D98"}]
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrgeelgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffokfgjfhggtgesrgdtmherredtjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfnvghslhhivgcuffgrihhglhgvfdcuoehluggrihhglhgvsehthhhinhhkihhnghgtrghtrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepthgvtghhrghrkhdrohhrghdpphhrohhofhhpohhinhhtrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvudeirdeiiedruddtvddrkeefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrheejngdpihhnvghtpedvudeirdeiiedruddtvddrkeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtoheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/DkrptVaqOt6zgWjRV4m2gUCEvKA>
Subject: [GGIE] Draft charter Re: Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items for Glass to Glass Internet Ecosystem of Video Content <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:03:09 -0000

Hiya,

The short answer is, no, we’ve heard nothing from the ADs since we had 
discussions in Prague.  I am following up with them.

In the meantime, here’s the draft charter, following our discussion in 
the VIG Whither session in Prague.

Media OPS (MOPS) WG

The Media OPS Working Group is a forum for coordinating the deployment, 
engineering, and operation of media streaming and manipulation protocols 
and procedures in the global Internet, inter-domain and single domain. 
In this case, media is considered to include the transport of video, 
audio, objects and any combination thereof, possibly non-sequentially. 
The scope is media and media protocols’ interactions with the network, 
but not the technology of control protocols or media formats.

This activity will include, but not be limited to:
– Document deployment operational gaps for video in the global 
Internet, including last mile issues
– Receive regular reports on the current state of the deployment of 
media technology, and media technology industry technology developments
– Create "practice and experience" documents that capture the 
experience of those who have deployed and are deploying various media 
technologies.
– Based on reports and other information, provide feedback to other 
relevant working groups.
– Develop mechanisms and procedures for sharing operational 
information to aid in operation of media technologies in the global 
Internet
– Develop tools, extend protocols and provide operational and 
implementation advice that assists in media technology administration, 
diagnostics, troubleshooting and deployment between/within native and 

non-native environments.
– This working group may develop requirements and assist in review and 
feedback of documents in other working groups responsible for such 
protocols.

Thoughts welcome.

Leslie.

On 22 Apr 2019, at 20:25, Holland, Jake wrote:

> Hi Leslie,
>
> Thanks for putting this together.
>
> I was wondering whether there was any update yet on the draft charter 
> for the media ops wg we discussed in Prague?  Or any other discussions 
> that have been happening on that front?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Jake
>
> From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
> Date: 2019-04-02 at 14:13
> To: "ggie@ietf.org" <ggie@ietf.org>
> Subject: [GGIE] Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to those who were able to come out and participate in last 
> week’s Video Interest Group meetings at IETF 104!
>
> Thumbnail re-cap — there’s clear interest in some kind of 
> formalization of the activity at the IETF; people who’ve been 
> following along have been leaning towards an OPS area WG. We’ll see 
> what the ADs decide.
>
> In the meantime, you can find notes from our VIG meeting here:
>
> https://yana.techark.org/20190327-video-interest-group-final/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__yana.techark.org_20190327-2Dvideo-2Dinterest-2Dgroup-2Dfinal_&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=bqnFROivDo_4iF8Z3R4DyNWKbbMeXr0LOgLnElT1Ook&m=yzWM1kLYys21AFp28yhilNkVnuSOEkIc1hkzo5irzbE&s=7p-fG6ZisgqfPfiO7tWe9XUh3PXAHXZ2qTM3uxZljwo&e=>
>
> And presentations from Jake Holland, Sanjay Mishra and Marc 
> Cymontkowski here:
>
> https://yana.techark.org/vig-at-ietf/vig-at-ietf-104-presentations/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__yana.techark.org_vig-2Dat-2Dietf_vig-2Dat-2Dietf-2D104-2Dpresentations_&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=bqnFROivDo_4iF8Z3R4DyNWKbbMeXr0LOgLnElT1Ook&m=yzWM1kLYys21AFp28yhilNkVnuSOEkIc1hkzo5irzbE&s=Xz5n4CSyPXoCvqT11ieXiUeCrQf9DDw0rPC-lulpGQ4&e=>
>
> (I was going to attach them, but they aren’t all small).
>
> Leslie.
>
> --
>
> ________________________________
>
> Leslie Daigle
> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
>
> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com<mailto:ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>