Re: [GGIE] [EXTERNAL] Re: Draft charter Re: Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104

"Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com> Tue, 23 April 2019 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A064120673 for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.453
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHNiJbb7ckNo for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00176a04.pphosted.com (mx0a-00176a04.pphosted.com [67.231.149.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7ACC12067E for <ggie@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0047964.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0047964.ppops.net-00176a04. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3NNmY4v001382 for <ggie@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 19:57:32 -0400
Received: from usaoamgip002.mail.tfayd.com ([173.213.212.136]) by m0047964.ppops.net-00176a04. with ESMTP id 2ryy131ecm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ggie@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 19:57:31 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO potemwp00022.mail.tfayd.com) ([10.40.78.204]) by usaoamgip002.mail.tfayd.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2019 19:55:25 -0400
Received: from potemwp00031.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.55) by potemwp00001.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:57:28 -0600
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.53) by potemwp00031.mail.tfayd.com (100.124.56.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:57:27 -0600
Received: from potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) by potemwp00029.mail.tfayd.com ([100.124.56.53]) with mapi id 15.01.0669.032; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:57:27 -0600
From: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
CC: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>, "ggie@ietf.org" <ggie@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [GGIE] Draft charter Re: Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104
Thread-Index: AQHU+ifDBUlNRbmSC06DHZ5uf+FU/KZKbEyA
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:57:27 +0000
Message-ID: <7255D24E-DBD2-499B-9190-455840DED5A9@nbcuni.com>
References: <E03C970A-A8A8-4272-B9C7-8040F6AFF293@thinkingcat.com> <89FC28E2-1F4D-4BAB-A04E-18266F56A547@akamai.com> <DB16BC1F-EA23-4936-A565-CDA1DCB42743@thinkingcat.com>, <9F7312D1-3F5C-41F4-998F-AECECA221B25@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9F7312D1-3F5C-41F4-998F-AECECA221B25@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-exclaimer-md-config: 47edc00f-f2d6-45ef-be83-8a353bd47e45
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7255D24EDBD2499B9190455840DED5A9nbcunicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-23_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904230171
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/PbElCB6sSGeJSCPdZvt253ah4ds>
Subject: Re: [GGIE] [EXTERNAL] Re: Draft charter Re: Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items for Glass to Glass Internet Ecosystem of Video Content <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:57:43 -0000

Hi Eric,

Perhaps coordinate or forum is not the optimum word for the task which is to help be an ingest point of contact for video projects that are seeking a friendly entry point who understands both the video technology needs and the ietf structure.

Any suggestions on perhaps other words that maybe better?

We do want to have a path to help video efforts that have ietf work or dependencies to engage with the larger community.

Glenn



On Apr 23, 2019, at 3:56 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com<mailto:evyncke@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hello Leslie,

Thank you for pushing this VIG forward. And, thank you as well for drafting a WG charter (but do not forget to ask for a WG-forming BoF for July 2019)

About the charter itself, may I suggest to follow the structure of V6OPS? Esp for the last bullet?

Also unsure whether “a forum for coordinating the deployment, ...” is accurate. If we ask for a forum, then we will get a mailing list (I am afraid). Also, do we need to ‘coordinate’ ?

Again, thank you for pushing video forward

-éric


From: GGIE <ggie-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ggie-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com<mailto:ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 23 April 2019 at 18:03
To: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com<mailto:jholland@akamai.com>>
Cc: "ggie@ietf.org<mailto:ggie@ietf.org>" <ggie@ietf.org<mailto:ggie@ietf.org>>
Subject: [GGIE] Draft charter Re: Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104


Hiya,

The short answer is, no, we’ve heard nothing from the ADs since we had discussions in Prague. I am following up with them.

In the meantime, here’s the draft charter, following our discussion in the VIG Whither session in Prague.

Media OPS (MOPS) WG

The Media OPS Working Group is a forum for coordinating the deployment, engineering, and operation of media streaming and manipulation protocols and procedures in the global Internet, inter-domain and single domain. In this case, media is considered to include the transport of video, audio, objects and any combination thereof, possibly non-sequentially. The scope is media and media protocols’ interactions with the network, but not the technology of control protocols or media formats.

This activity will include, but not be limited to:
– Document deployment operational gaps for video in the global Internet, including last mile issues
– Receive regular reports on the current state of the deployment of media technology, and media technology industry technology developments
– Create "practice and experience" documents that capture the experience of those who have deployed and are deploying various media technologies.
– Based on reports and other information, provide feedback to other relevant working groups.
– Develop mechanisms and procedures for sharing operational information to aid in operation of media technologies in the global Internet
– Develop tools, extend protocols and provide operational and implementation advice that assists in media technology administration, diagnostics, troubleshooting and deployment between/within native and 
non-native environments.
– This working group may develop requirements and assist in review and feedback of documents in other working groups responsible for such protocols.

Thoughts welcome.

Leslie.

On 22 Apr 2019, at 20:25, Holland, Jake wrote:

Hi Leslie,



Thanks for putting this together.



I was wondering whether there was any update yet on the draft charter for the media ops wg we discussed in Prague?  Or any other discussions that have been happening on that front?



Thanks and regards,

Jake



From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com<mailto:ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>>
Date: 2019-04-02 at 14:13
To: "ggie@ietf.org<mailto:ggie@ietf.org>" <ggie@ietf.org<mailto:ggie@ietf.org>>
Subject: [GGIE] Notes and presentations -- VIG at IETF 104



Hi,

Thanks to those who were able to come out and participate in last week’s Video Interest Group meetings at IETF 104!

Thumbnail re-cap — there’s clear interest in some kind of formalization of the activity at the IETF; people who’ve been following along have been leaning towards an OPS area WG. We’ll see what the ADs decide.

In the meantime, you can find notes from our VIG meeting here:

https://yana.techark.org/20190327-video-interest-group-final/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__yana.techark.org_20190327-2Dvideo-2Dinterest-2Dgroup-2Dfinal_&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=bqnFROivDo_4iF8Z3R4DyNWKbbMeXr0LOgLnElT1Ook&m=yzWM1kLYys21AFp28yhilNkVnuSOEkIc1hkzo5irzbE&s=7p-fG6ZisgqfPfiO7tWe9XUh3PXAHXZ2qTM3uxZljwo&e=>

And presentations from Jake Holland, Sanjay Mishra and Marc Cymontkowski here:

https://yana.techark.org/vig-at-ietf/vig-at-ietf-104-presentations/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__yana.techark.org_vig-2Dat-2Dietf_vig-2Dat-2Dietf-2D104-2Dpresentations_&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=bqnFROivDo_4iF8Z3R4DyNWKbbMeXr0LOgLnElT1Ook&m=yzWM1kLYys21AFp28yhilNkVnuSOEkIc1hkzo5irzbE&s=Xz5n4CSyPXoCvqT11ieXiUeCrQf9DDw0rPC-lulpGQ4&e=>

(I was going to attach them, but they aren’t all small).

Leslie.

--

________________________________

Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises

ldaigle@thinkingcat.com<mailto:ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
_______________________________________________
GGIE mailing list
GGIE@ietf.org<mailto:GGIE@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie