Re: [GGIE] [EXTERNAL] Re: 20181107-VIG-IETF103-Bangkok.pdf

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Thu, 15 November 2018 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E0F128B14 for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:38:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ChRRrXp103ml for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:38:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A770E126CB6 for <ggie@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=43576 helo=[192.168.0.71]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1gNRDL-0005HY-4P; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:38:23 +0000
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <35377AC4-748B-45FF-8606-36BCD896EB08@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CCED4093-6AA6-4484-8420-EE1964D20108"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:38:16 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AD660375-7848-47F6-BA98-80858AC09F99@nbcuni.com>
Cc: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>, "ggie@ietf.org" <ggie@ietf.org>, Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>
References: <208E78BA-EE5D-461A-B894-96E417EBB2BD@thinkingcat.com> <851DAF1A-5CCF-4FBF-82DC-885ADA95D6B6@akamai.com> <AD660375-7848-47F6-BA98-80858AC09F99@nbcuni.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/S8XDYnYNr4F4Sl2OlJ9SV_ccmBk>
Subject: Re: [GGIE] [EXTERNAL] Re: 20181107-VIG-IETF103-Bangkok.pdf
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items surfaced in the W3C GGIE Task Force <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:38:31 -0000

> On 15 Nov 2018, at 09:27, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> wrote:
> 
> If we did want to explore that route would would likely need to wait until the new IIRTF chair is chosen and seated at IETF104. 
> 
> One, Among a few, of my concerns with being in the IRTF is that much of what we are talking about is being done in order to do initial deployment operationally in the near term (6-18mos) and isn’t research with a lot of academics 

Looking at the charters of the DNSOPS and V6OPS working groups, they seem to focus on documenting deployment issues, sharing operational practices and producing guidelines, and documenting open issues that either need standards work or research so new work can be spun-up as needed. Has thought been given to trying to form a VideoOPS working group along those lines?

Colin




> I’m sure we could attract academics but they maybe in a space that’s research - more abstract and less deplorable. 
> 
> Glenn
> 
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 7:40 AM, Holland, Jake <jholland@akamai.com <mailto:jholland@akamai.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>  
>> Thanks for writing this up, Leslie.
>>  
>> I think there was also a suggestion to turn this video interest meeting forum into an IRTF research group, with a few people concurring that it seemed like a good idea.
>>  
>> Is there any interest from people on this list in following up on that suggestion?  I think it’s a good idea, and a good fit with the nature of the presentations that we’ve seen, and the kinds of problems we’ve been grappling with.
>>  
>> Best,
>> Jake
>>  
>> From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com <mailto:ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>>
>> Date: 2018-11-14 at 13:52
>> To: "ggie@ietf.org <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>" <ggie@ietf.org <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>>
>> Subject: [GGIE] 20181107-VIG-IETF103-Bangkok.pdf
>>  
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone who joined the discussion last week in Bangkok! Please find attached some notes from our session at IETF 103.
>> 
>> Leslie.
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Leslie Daigle
>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
>> 
>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com <mailto:ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>_______________________________________________
>> GGIE mailing list
>> GGIE@ietf.org <mailto:GGIE@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>
> _______________________________________________
> GGIE mailing list
> GGIE@ietf.org <mailto:GGIE@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>


-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/