Re: [GGIE] IAB shepherd appointed

"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E361296E7 for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:18:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.175
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvKk82n62XgP for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74D0E1296CE for <ggie@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBF420047604; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:18:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=l4TgKSuBk75dB5prZcJt3h8smWU =; b=UlP8Kuq1Yo3oh8ES41zN8PMzsQrfRwVEWy6HZc2iV/NN7LyZbAKR+gQlS+2 Wpb+RBWgPiYeXBodqvFEboj9T5ZhdWEgjZWWOAUCrCli4iU99dG3VBeWZEqSmive tFjiQqfnCL/5A/EVqY9VgI/2OEDkfqfpIUzKdsQ0N23uKsWU=
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (pool-71-171-98-61.clppva.fios.verizon.net [71.171.98.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leslie@oceanpurl.net) by homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C21D2004760B; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:18:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:18:46 -0500
Message-ID: <C047ED7E-4B68-4FED-A666-5F30F12056BF@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170210211329.GI93137@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <20170210200735.GE93137@mx4.yitter.info> <2A8A14C3-E5D0-4F0D-905D-455F605F80DA@thinkingcat.com> <20170210211329.GI93137@mx4.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_DD827A7D-BBAD-42B7-88B2-B5E6C39B6CC6_="
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5344)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/eG9L2mGdBdA7EWCFL9dcoiIMErc>
Cc: ggie@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GGIE] IAB shepherd appointed
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items surfaced in the W3C GGIE Task Force <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:18:53 -0000

Last June, I did this talk at a NIST workshop:

http://web.thinkingcat.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/20160601-GGIE-NIST-NDN.pdf

I think it gets at some of the points in more detail (certainly, more 
detail than section 6 of the I-D).  I realize it’s not an IETF 
document, but if there’s material there that you think would be 
helpful in scoping the discussion, we can certainly work on an update to 
the I-D.

Leslie.

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises LLC
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On 10 Feb 2017, at 16:13, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:07:12PM -0500, Leslie Daigle wrote:
>> 1/ a desire to address the video-overloading-[parts-of]-the-network 
>> problem
>
> This part I get.
>
>> 2/ a belief that there are useful things that can be done to look at 
>> video
>> as application slightly differently, and making use of the network 
>> more
>> completely
>
> This part I sort of get, but I'm not totally sold that
> draft-deen-daigle-ggie-02 lays that out in a way I understand quite
> what's different and not.  §6 ought to be doing that, but it doesn't
> seem to me to have set questions that are precise enough.  And indeed,
> some of the bits don't seem that unusual to video.  In particular,
> neither alternate-source nor alternate-format is really a video
> problem as such.
>
>> 3/ a set of documents that outline a proposal for how to do some of 
>> that —
>> documents are easier to discuss than hand-waving concepts
>
> Well, yes, but these also jump to the solution without (2), above.
>
> I think scoping the (2) part of this so that the nature of the work is
> somewhat clearer will be a necessary condition for bof success.
>
> A
>
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> GGIE mailing list
> GGIE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie