IETF Logo Mail Archive

[GGIE] Meeting in Prague, IETF 104

"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Tue, 29 January 2019 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1148113107A for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:14:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m0h5PXdUI2JX for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from insect.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (insect.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4B713104F for <ggie@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:14:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|leslie@oceanpurl.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C665C4A10; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:14:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.36.160]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2E31B5C49CB; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:14:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|leslie@oceanpurl.net
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.16.2); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:14:28 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|leslie@oceanpurl.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Coil-Arch: 0775ba8a71392d35_1548800068384_1893046435
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1548800068384:2181628033
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1548800068384
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52FD7ED36; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:14:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=RBSV+SYbOCsWsb LvDwb1i/q78fU=; b=EeseftOYjGC69FJqY4vEtI9cMJnNvh+VXXZdPxAAgGi2YL nKHFPF0nxd1Wh2ndlOEkyieaQud/1sOb/94Gef5in/QkUuh2uQLm1jF2b6arxQks x44DnnEocQC4pYIZBd0SslBmwR/17VOZ+fvxPIjpJjjjgWQZO6P6q2gUZR1uc=
Received: from [192.168.1.94] (vtelinet-216-66-102-83.vermontel.net [216.66.102.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leslie@oceanpurl.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 797C67F645; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:14:26 -0800 (PST)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a35
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: ggie@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 17:14:07 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <3568F24B-3740-4E04-92C6-8C71375E7776@thinkingcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_FAFFCA86-5E54-4F2B-A7E7-6FF8972EAAD1_="
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrjedvgdduheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffokfggtgfgsegrkehmreertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqnecukfhppedvudeirdeiiedruddtvddrkeefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrleegngdpihhnvghtpedvudeirdeiiedruddtvddrkeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtoheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/wn5goBTN1P-gG5ShRAkb6xxfs4c>
Subject: [GGIE] Meeting in Prague, IETF 104
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items surfaced in the W3C GGIE Task Force <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:14:37 -0000

Hi,

I don’t think we reached any kind of closure on our discussion, after 
IETF 103, about the form or function of this group within the IETF.  
And, it seems like it might be helpful to have a broader audience weigh 
in on those questions, than just the folks subscribed here and still 
reading this.

So, I propose 2 separate sessions at IETF 104:

1/ We’ll find a slot to talk about options for formalizing this group 
within the IETF universe (or decide not to).

2/ We’ll have our regular get together to talk through technical 
topics of interest.

Suggestions for technical topics of interest are hereby solicited!

Leslie.

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email