[green-bof] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-green-00-02: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 17 September 2024 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: green-bof@ietf.org
Delivered-To: green-bof@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.67] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A30C14F74E; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172659631095.191482.8325949214369981503@dt-datatracker-65695bf5bc-rgg8z>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:05:10 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: JKXBLUI6IH452CYIOTIZXLBQQDHMSWUD
X-Message-ID-Hash: JKXBLUI6IH452CYIOTIZXLBQQDHMSWUD
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: green-chairs@ietf.org, green-bof@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Subject: [green-bof] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-green-00-02: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: "BoF preparation and charter related discussions for holding a WG forming BoF, with the idea of forming a Green networking WG" <green-bof.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/green-bof/m9KPI1E-R8Mf4BrK9gro3QcH8Tk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/green-bof>
List-Help: <mailto:green-bof-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:green-bof-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:green-bof@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:green-bof-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:green-bof-leave@ietf.org>

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-green-00-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-green/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

** Per Goal and Scope

-- “The GREEN Working Group is chartered to explore use cases and derive
requirements for identifying and characterizing energy efficiency metrics,
methods related to energy consumption of network devices, and optimizing energy
efficiency across the network.”

This text says the WG will “explore use cases and derive requirements”.  It
then provides a list of things it will concentrate on to include publishing
YANG models.  In what way are YANG models either use cases or requirements?

-- “Developing or selecting a multi-level framework for energy efficiency
monitoring, energy efficiency capability discovery, and control within a
network domain”

What is a “multi-level framework”?  Could this be more clearly aligned with the
work items?

-- “Initially, the GREEN Working Group is expected to focus on simple
foundational building blocks for new energy efficiency strategies for
operators, striving to illustrate industry implementation and adoption of the
working group output before potentially considering more complex aspects of
energy efficient networks in a future charter.”

In what way does this text scope the activities of the WG?  Is there some
notion of an adoption requirement before so additional tranche of work is done?
 What set of work is the “simple foundational building blocks”?

** Per Dependencies and Liaisons:

-- “The WG will collaborate with industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies to
ensure alignment with current and future regulatory frameworks”

What regulatory bodies?  What current regulatory frameworks would the solutions
produced by this WG need to meet?

** Per the milestones:

-- “Develop a framework for incremental deployment of energy-aware tools
management” -- “Develop and agree upon a standardized set of terminologies and
definitions related to energy use and efficiency in networking”

How will one know that one has developed the above?  Can this be restated in
the form of a document adoption, WGLC or sending something to the IESG.