Re: [GROW] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2622 (7564)

["Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Authors, Grow WG, Warren,

I don’t know RPSL, but reading the errata, and section 5.6 of that document, my instinct is that this errata is valid.  Is anyone able to confirm please?

Regards,
Rob


From: Chris Smiley <[e-mail]>
Date: Thursday, 13 July 2023 at 22:00
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>
Cc: RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2622 (7564)
Greetings,

This errata reports a problem with Section 86-13269662805/RFC2622. Upon further review, we believe it should point to Section 5.6/RFC2622.

We have updated accordingly. Please let us know any concerns.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs



> On Jul 13, 2023, at 6:31 AM, RFC Errata System <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2622,
> "Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7564
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jiang Li <[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 86-13269662805
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> In page 26 of RFC2622
> In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2
> and 9.9.9.3.
> (7) peering-set: prng-bar
> peering: AS1 at 9.9.9.1
> peering-set: prng-foo
> peering: prng-bar
> peering: AS2 at 9.9.9.1
> aut-num: AS1
> import: from prng-foo accept { 128.9.0.0/16 }
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2
> and 9.9.9.3.
> (7) peering-set: prng-bar
> peering: AS3 at 9.9.9.1
> peering-set: prng-foo
> peering: prng-bar
> peering: AS2 at 9.9.9.1
> aut-num: AS1
> import: from prng-foo accept { 128.9.0.0/16 }
>
> Notes
> -----
> As  "Figure 22: Example topology consisting of three ASes, AS1, AS2, and
> AS3; two exchange points, EX1 and EX2; and six routers." shows, the router 9.9.9.1 of AS1 connects to the router 9.9.9.3 of AS3 in exchange point 2.  It states that "In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2 and 9.9.9.3.", so I think the corresponding AS of 9.9.9.3 should be AS3 instead of AS1.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC2622 (draft-ietf-rps-rpsl-v2-03)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL)
> Publication Date    : June 1999
> Author(s)           : C. Alaettinoglu, C. Villamizar, E. Gerich, D. Kessens, D. Meyer, T. Bates, D. Karrenberg, M. Terpstra
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Routing Policy System
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>