IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] Prefix limit ORF

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 26 March 2019 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D76E12038E for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Iw16qx0CY96 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33757120393 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id v32so15166718qtc.10 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=n5xWZJFklq3zJshpzLwMjkcB6RKKDGDBuI7FAmqXDVM=; b=LUurLwL+2MYQKfQa7JGI0/OvclobomBXrJ0XV55m0dRo328+aEWekGajutdWYJ8MRQ dMds3NjHG08NZsdbyKlN0AZcnatmgm1NTo98wkaFe//caiJpcYNQd526dWdcT5Y2zF6a HxtD4yvOX9wc6fgvVPMLKO6PjFVlzjzFL+GsyiCZnkuMJ5KiNHx3PSmLfI9KWOGhqdHg rRC0GmHqTYluq69+7TD3VeuLdi/j03O96SExhhByjzwu12uOhafaRWpCf96LcoFUHGkY howCGP5k4t6d2vwg9QkMPYBZ6gNdNv5UgK5Butwtu5PkrlT2g/K1/Eyc3k9IKqbfiqiy j//A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n5xWZJFklq3zJshpzLwMjkcB6RKKDGDBuI7FAmqXDVM=; b=YvA840OtwhiiK5KpN7H4CGE4RitmktSNlvKVkd+PqvenAnuod4qwEajzppItfl83dQ pACoSWlWqXMltyuzUmGBM4mpmk0cv+0S79ekPS2pqLjxls+hyj5WgdVE61LaXbAExW7g AMn1tGsSxQeLSp7bk5HdGjTIsDgJZyIDaXkuvY5CgKPQ+c6gEnHvnCNL8UeY+5pm3qZX imxXq4g7Z66mT1U5fP6JuBYhIhQhORsLhme+Ssy8hxAuzniwiDi9xo3VN/2pPxnlAxAV 10m5V/w8Ud8FlxI+V/Y6hCcklnaRZ5faCXPpnC8sE1DKOGnPi2Gq/BYQY8/crjm/gkmE 2hMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDy57RlQ3vAVXPbeO9IUg7XcO4DKtfvlryhkvJcDr9jrRSuhgz +vdY0zXx6uYGD8NAUeGobbQ2X7cR4M8/HzYY7r7EaA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyr1QoqQCi1StBEVFRA4nxpz614HYtdqzYa93mq5nndz57bGNqoMLEPbcbbK7YTbOOUeXaaYEXYmZO+E8jBD84=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:fb0:: with SMTP id b45mr26750852qtk.293.1553616157022; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D8F9A493-D343-4AFD-96DF-3F702BF79597@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D8F9A493-D343-4AFD-96DF-3F702BF79597@juniper.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:02:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHPMG92Z_vK-nxeFri-12cJZDXNUxX42bOsOX4rrzJ0YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028400a05850173a1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/2BjQff0IF5gQT7oHe0kE3Lf74qQ>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Prefix limit ORF
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:02:41 -0000

And with this in mind the draft needs to define expected behaviour when
locally configured outbound prefix limit is different from ORF pushed one
(someone's inbound).

Lowest wins, static wins, latest wins etc ... otherwise each implementation
may choose differently ;)

thx
R.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 16:59 John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> Apropos Job’s talk just now —
>
> draft-keyur-idr-bgp-prefix-limit-orf-03
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-keyur-idr-bgp-prefix-limit-orf-03
>
> —John
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email