[GROW] [Errata Rejected] RFC4384 (4550)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 29 March 2017 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1869012946A; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbRjdDe7aWhw; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A6A129510; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A2E6AB81926; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: wt@penguintechs.org, dmm@1-4-5.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: joelja@bogus.com, iesg@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170329183418.A2E6AB81926@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:34:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/50cz_sTqB0BXORkNy2oJAVbAldg>
Subject: [GROW] [Errata Rejected] RFC4384 (4550)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:34:32 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC4384, "BGP Communities for Data Collection". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4384&eid=4550 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Warren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org> Date Reported: 2015-12-01 Rejected by: joel jaeggli (IESG) Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- The chart at the bottom of 4.1: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0x00 | 0x0008 | 0x2A7C | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0x00 | 0x00 | 0x10F2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0x00 | 0x08 | 0x2A7C | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0x00 | 0x00 | 0x10F2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- The second group has a hex value that looks like two octets: "0x0008". If I am interpreting the chart, extended community RFCs, and the extended community IANA registry correctly, the second group should be a single octet (i.e., "0x08"). Also, the same error is in the Section 4.2 chart. --VERIFIER NOTES-- The Transitive Two-Octet AS-Specific Extended Community Sub-Types registry specifies the low order byte as it notes: Reference [RFC7153] Note This registry contains values of the second octet (the "Sub-Type" field) of an extended community when the value of the first octet (the "Type" field) is 0x00. so the diagram which includes both is correct but obviously somewhat hard to read since it contains both bytes. I think this proposed text ads little additional clarity. -------------------------------------- RFC4384 (draft-ietf-grow-collection-communities-06) -------------------------------------- Title : BGP Communities for Data Collection Publication Date : February 2006 Author(s) : D. Meyer Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Global Routing Operations Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [GROW] [Errata Rejected] RFC4384 (4550) RFC Errata System